This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, July 7, 2009 12:00 AM

Life is out of whack

It may drive ecologists crazy to talk about a balance in nature. But it's more necessary than ever

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, July 6, 2009 07:39 PM

    Meaning What?

    There is a difference between saying "models that talk about a balance of nature are useful" (the usefulness depending on what you're trying to do) and "there really is a balance of nature, get used to it."

    This article could really have benefited from a definition of "the balance of nature," before trying to decide if such a thing existed or not. Anyone who writes "life thrives in a balance between natural imbalance and balance" is obviously using multiple definitions of the word at the same time. That's good for metaphors and poems. Hard science requires something more specific.

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
385

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
177

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon