Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

108
Letters
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:00 AM

Horses to the slaughter

U.S. horses are meeting gruesome ends abroad, while the debate rages on: Are horses 1,500 pounds of food or friend?

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, June 29, 2009 06:59 PM

Sorry Megan, but I think it's OK to slaughter horses.

Nothing wasted. Efficiency to use them well in life and then use them well in death. We eat other animals as well. Your arguement seems more pro-vegan than anti-meat. To each her own I say; if you don't like it, avoid anything that may have horse in it. Dictating to the rest of us only makes you a dictator.

But if you really wish to try to make a difference then I suggest finding ways to convince legislators to tax the process and products to death. At some point other cheaper alternatives will sway demand away from equine products. This would have to happen across North America so be prepared to take your fight out of country.

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:58 PM

horses can't be humanely slaughtered under any system which has a realistic chance of being implemented anywhere, the resources to do it right and enforce it will NEVER be available

so the only humane way to handle the situation is to apply the same legal standards and practices that are applied to cats and dogs. (You can legally shoot your own dog, but if you miss and therefore aren't quick you are legally liable, this would work with horses too when necessary).

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:57 PM

What about other animals?

I feel bad for the horses described in the article. However I have a hard time respecting the opinion of people who get all up in arms about mistreating those animal species which are commonly kept as pets, such as horses, dogs, cats, or bunnies; while mostly ignoring the plight of other animals, such as pigs, cows, sheep, or chickens, which aren't treated any better than the horses described in this article. I'm quite sure the slaughterhouses being criticized in the article don't treat other animals any better. I'm certainly not going to buy into the idea that someone who would slaughter a horse for food is any worse a person than someone who would slaughter a pig. Either slaughtering animals for food is bad, or it's not, and either treating animals humanely is good, or it's not.

This quote from the article was especially richly ironic:

It's a betrayal to put [horses] on a cattle truck and send them to slaughter.

She's condemning putting horses on a cattle truck for slaughter. Did she even realize as she was saying this that it might make sense to also be concerned about the cattle that the truck was meant for? What's special about horses, other than that people in this country tend to keep them as pets and work with them one on one.

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:53 PM

In rural NH

horse disposal is a problem due to the lack of slaughterhouses. The only practical disposal means is to hire a backhoe, dig a hole, and dump the horse. Many horses are suffering neglect and abuse, in many cases starving to death, and there is zero room in horse shelters. I know a horse slaughterhouse sounds cruel, but it is humane to give a quick end to an old horse, and ethical to use that animal's remains for good use.

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:39 PM

Killing horses for food is not animal creulty

Conditions need to be improved in the slaughterhouses but we eat other animals.

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:38 PM

Newsflash!

Cows, sheep, chickens, rabbits, goats, turkeys are all meeting gruesome ends.

Even people meet gruesome ends.

This is due to a design flaw in the universe.

Monday, June 29, 2009 06:21 PM

This is America, damnit

Pets before People.

Most Active Letters Threads

359

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
172

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon