This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:00 AM

God enough

We should see the ceaseless creativity of nature as sacred, argues biologist Stuart Kauffman, despite what Richard Dawkins might say.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, November 19, 2008 02:56 PM

    @bigguns

    I meant "materialism" as in the philosophical sense, like positivism or scientism and unlike Platonism.

    Sorry if these words are unfamiliar to you but they are pertinent to the discussion.

    If you believe that science is conceptually complete, that "science" is interchangeable with the term "rationality", then you are indeed a materialist. This philosophy is really inconsistent with all the major religions.

    Conversely if you are sympathetic with any form of Platonism, then I would ask you why the idealised concept of God seems so bizarre to you.

    It's up to you whether or not you engage meaningfully...I'm just trying to inject a bit of rationality into the discussion.

Most Active Letters Threads

516

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
360

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
174

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon