This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, September 25, 2006 12:00 AM

Clinton blasts Fox

Clinton goes on the attack against right-wingers and Fox.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, September 25, 2006 02:11 PM

    contextualizing clips

    I'm going to agree with Anonymous who was taken aback by the editorializing posing as referencing vis a vis the Clinton/Wallace clip. It reminded me of the "over the top" comment about Keith Olbermann's critiqe of Bush. Who writes these things anyway? Could they sign their names? That way the reader is clued in about how to contextualize the contextualization. The Fix too says that Clinton's anger was terrifying. (?). I'm still furious with Clinton--I don't blame Ken Starr as much as Himself for the distractions of his presidency--but whenever I see Clinton--in Wordplay, or here, I get so nostalgic for a smart President--a President who keeps knowledge and memory of knowledge, you know, with him. And in this case, I think Clinton was absolutely right to fight back about a faulty rhetoric that is surfacing with a vengence. And I loved his "little smirk" remark. I bet that Chris Wallace gets self-conscious about his facial responses now.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
264

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon