Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

4
Letters
Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:00 AM

Bateman: Let the war crimes trial begin!

ABC's Jonathan Karl asks Cheney about waterboarding and other tactics used against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, December 17, 2008 02:51 PM

Waterboarding Isn't Torture

As a SEAL bound for Vietnam back in the day I spent a few days at SERE school (Survival, Evasion, Resistance Evasion)at Warner Springs CA. It sucked to say the least but not nearly as bad as SEAL training. I was lucky enough to be the most junior enlisted man in the large group of "prisoners". That made me the whipping boy or in my case the guy who got the waterboard treatment. I spent quite a bit of time beign waterboarded.I passed out a few times. It sort of feels like being drowned on land. It was unpleasant but as you can tell I did not die since I am writing this. I would not say it was torture. It was rough persuasion. Torture is pulling out finger nails, having your shoulders dislocated etc. I had friend who was there and he had his moustache pulled out hair by hair. That isn't torture either.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 08:26 PM

It's torture, and illegal.

Whether or not a given enlisted man thinks waterboarding is torture is beside the point. It's torture. Japanese soldiers were convicted of war crimes for using waterboarding in WWII, and waterboarding is illegal under US law (http://lawreview.wustl.edu/slip-opinions/waterboarding-is-illegal/). Bush and Cheney's excuse is that they're exempt from the statute because they're the executive branch, and can do what they want.

Thursday, December 18, 2008 09:25 AM

Torture is torture.

That it is wrong, nobody can deny. Whether it can be excused if it produces results... begs the question: does it produce results? It seems the evidence is accumulating that it doesn't. There are better ways of gathering intelligence.

Thursday, December 18, 2008 09:48 AM

Seal76

I agree with you that what you went through was not torture. But there is a crucial difference between your own experience and that of a victim of actual torture:

YOU WERE IN TRAINING!

Although there may be no difference in method (waterboarding, pulling out mustache hairs, etc), there is most certainly a difference in kind. Had you been kidnapped, jailed, and waterboarded by a foreign power -- well, in Bushworld, it could be your own govt -- never knowing when the "simulated drowning" would end, and the actual drowning begin, then, and ONLY then, would you have experienced torture. You, by contrast, were in a safe environment, notwithstanding the extreme difficulties and dangers of advanced military training.

This is even more the case for those dishonest reporters who have undergone waterboarding for the purposes of writing an article about it. There was no interrogation, no sleep deprivation, no abject fear, and no danger of them being killed by a govt agent who was having a bad day.

For you to call your training "torture" is as absurd as calling a roller coaster ride an extreme sport.

Jim French

Most Active Letters Threads

538

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
432

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
199

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
139

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon