Letters to the Editor
-
Why is this on video?
Again Salon demonstrates a failure to understand the purpose of video.
Video is for things that need a visual component. Simple as that. Things that are enhanced by video, or incomplete without video.
Some guy just talking would be a much better presentation in text. Especially if the person talking is not a very good speaker.
Graham Hill may or may not have important things to say. I don't know. I couldn't stand watching his inept presentation, and clicked it off about a third of the way through. I would like a chance to read his words. I am not going to suffer through his amateurish presentation.
Please, Salon, figure out what should be presented as video and what should be presented as text*. Stop presenting things as video just for the novelty of it.
*Hint: About 90% of what you currently present as video would be much better as text.