Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
Since the assumption that men were "totally in charge" and now just "have to share" is the abslute and total relevant truth of the situation past and present then any analysis must be based on that premise and must not conflict with it. Therefore if men are not "sharing nicely" then it has to be a conspiracy to remain "totally in charge" and when it is obvious, such as in this case, that there is no capacity to conspire to do anything then the situation is just inexplicable (or is evidence of innate defectiveness).
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox
