Read other letters about this article
Since the assumption that men were "totally in charge" and now just "have to share" is the abslute and total relevant truth of the situation past and present then any analysis must be based on that premise and must not conflict with it. Therefore if men are not "sharing nicely" then it has to be a conspiracy to remain "totally in charge" and when it is obvious, such as in this case, that there is no capacity to conspire to do anything then the situation is just inexplicable (or is evidence of innate defectiveness).