This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:00 AM

Women are the new men on TV

Broads are the cops and lawyers and masters of the business universe on the new shows. So what happened to the men?

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, September 12, 2007 09:57 AM

    There is a trend at work

    While I suppose it's de rigeur to suggest that women are more often (or at least more negatively) stereotyped on the small screen, I've long thought the opposite true: male stupidity and inability are central themes of television and have been for some time. Compare Homer and Marge or, a generation earlier, Fred and Wilma. Husband is unquestionably a moron and wife picks up all the slack. (And then consider what's being imprinted on youngsters watching.) And it's not just cartoons: the screeching idiot father on Malcolm in the Middle; the obvious intelligence gap between Sam and Diane on Cheers or Tony and Angela on Who's the Boss?. No doubt you can make a list of contrary examples, but broadly I think Traister is confirming a trend not discovering a new theme.

    I would offer one possible explanation, at least for the comedy. Going pantsless is simply not funny unless its a male character. I don't think this is a cultural artifact but something a little more primordial: scenes that involve physical injury or juvenile stupidity simply don't make us (women and men) laugh when a women is involved. Can you imagine a woman being anally raped by a baboon in a sitcom? Would anyone find any amusement in it whatsoever? I doubt it--more likely, the producers would be arrested.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
407

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon