Science fiction is too important to be left to Hollywood sleaze merchants, especially ones with big budgets. I've felt for a long time that the Michael Rennie original could be redone, but that it would take more imagination than I've seen displayed in any mainstream scifi film, ever--and that goes for anything from Spielberg or Lucas.
The remake should've been tasked to some lean, hungry outsider with a real love for classic SF. Instead, if O'Hehir's review is accurate, we get CGI and what passes for humanoid emotion these days.
I still plan on seeing this--maybe some shred of the original, which is an essential experience, remains. I suspect that Mr. O'Hehir, like most non-SF people, has little patience with the rather elaborate suspension-of-belief mechanism needed to get through the door with most SF. But for devotees it's worth the cover charge.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox