This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, July 25, 2008 12:00 AM

"Brideshead Revisited"

No expense has been spared in this lavish, streamlined adaptation, but is there such a thing as too much good taste?

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, July 25, 2008 08:32 AM

    Why Bother

    When I heard they were remaking this, I couldn't imagine why. About a year ago, I watched all of the episodes from the eighties, and I agree with LB that they were very slow, and not rewarding, except as a showcase for the performances of Anthony A., especially, and john Gielgud as Ryder's father. Olivier was good, too. Great actors on a beautiful stage, making their way through a very elaborate reading of a pretty good book (that was not one of Waugh's favorites--he thought it was too sentimental). One great thing about the original production was that Irons and Andrews did not look alike, so you could tell them apart perfectly. Not so this time. This production is a real mistake. Every generation does not need a new version of every novel.

Most Active Letters Threads

436

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
64

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon