This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, December 9, 2005 12:00 AM

"Memoirs of a Geisha"

Pile into the rickshaw for a slooooooow ride: This very serious, very long, very pretty picture never really gets moving.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, December 9, 2005 05:14 AM

    "Memoirs of a Geisha"

    Can someone please explain the strange ads and new book cover showing a Chinese woman with startling bright blue eyes? Did it somehow escape my attention that eye color changing contact lenses were widely used in Pre-WWII Japan?

    It's certainly an arresting image but I find it hugely off-putting about two seconds after it catches my attention.

    I went through three, I think, copies of the book since I lent mine out out and they never came back so I can't skim through the book but I don't recall the lead character being referred to at any point as physically beautiful.

    That was entirely beyond the point in the creation of a wholly artificial cultural symbol. The conventions of the makeup and elaborate hairstyles strip much of the individuality from a geisha's appearance and surely that's part of the tradition. So much more emphasis was placed on other skills and attributes, mastery of music, grace of movement and conversation. And of course, the fabulous, restrictive and astonishingly costly kimonos.

    I can not presently muster much enthusiasm for seeing this adaptation, though I may end up doing so for the simple reason that virtually everything else in the theaters is purest and unalloyed tripe.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
273

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon