This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, February 23, 2009 12:00 AM

Are the Oscars recession-proof?

Kate Winslet and "Slumdog Millionaire" rule, while Hugh Jackman gives the awards an extreme makeover and -- miracle of miracles -- it works!

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, February 23, 2009 05:42 AM

    So my review is coming from another planet, obviously....

    I thought Jackman paled in comparison to the great hosts of the past. I thought the musical numbers had no connection, in many cases, to the award show we were watching. I missed the offstage voice telling us that this oscar was "[fill in the blank]'s third nomination, and first win". I sorely missed seeing clips of the nominated actor's work, and I could not help but wonder why there seemed to be a celebration of how the movie going public ignores great films like "The Reader". I was hoping for a remake that would take out the lengthy speeches by the winners of art direction, costume design and other awards. Loved Fey and Martin, though. They should've been the hosts.

Most Active Letters Threads

364

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
194

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
95

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
48

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon