Letters to the Editor
-
I don't get any of it
The paintings...
are way cool. That's for sure.
Are they orders of magnitude more cool than any other paintings done by any other four-year-old with access to fingerpaints and nice paper?
This is what I don't get about the whole thing. What makes her paintings "masterpieces", but the equally "abstract" finger-paintings and brush paintings and teddy-bear-head sticker art by every other little kid just regular kid-art?

