This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, October 2, 2008 12:00 AM

Bill Maher vs. the "talking snake"

The HBO host and comedian talks about "Religulous," his onslaught against the religious idiocy that threatens to deliver America to Sarah Palin and her fellow "space god" worshipers.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, October 2, 2008 02:53 PM

    It's the pilgrimage, not the destination

    Religion is not the issue. Fundamentalism is not the issue. Rote acceptance of irreconcilable dogma is not the issue. The trouble comes when an adherent of whatever world view decides to impose it on another. There have been religious monsters throughout history, most definitely - but there have also been political and economic and technological monsters as well.

    It is just as wrong to accept the tenets of science without examining them critically for oneself, as to proclaim membership in a church that one has not conscientiously vetted. One key difference is that a properly posed scientific assertion is falsifiable. Buy a cheap microscope or telescope or stop watch - many of the great observations of science lie within the easy reach of kitchen experiments. Most religious assertions, however, don't lend themselves to being posed properly in the first place. We are told Jesus is the Son of God. But what does it mean to be a "Son of God"? How could mere mortals possibly comprehend such a family dynamic?

    The assertions of science are far grander than those of religion. We need only believe in one Son of God. Been there, done that. Science argues for laws of nature that span identically from one side of the universe to the other, from billions of years in the past to billions of years in the future, from perfect vacuum to colliding neutron stars to the colossal black holes now conjectured to inhabit the centers of all galaxies. These things are true (or not), whether or not we believe in them. Science requires no piety. One suspects God doesn't either.

    However, the central question isn't whether the panoply of the world's religions are falsifiable. After all, adherents of each religion reject the tenets of all the others. Rather, the central question is a very human one. Whether we call it hubris or chutzpah or arrogance or sinful pride, the failure is all too human. We need not look to God for someone to blame.

Most Active Letters Threads

527

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
430

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
189

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
131

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
103

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon