Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

12
Letters
Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:00 AM

The dark side of the moon

Sam Rockwell and Duncan Jones talk about their new space movie and the pleasures of 1970s science fiction films.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 07:36 PM

Um...spoiler warning?

Or would your interview with Neil Jordan before The Crying Game opened have been titled "Transvestite and ex-IRA Man on the run?"

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 07:54 PM

There's a Tiny Spaceship, waiting in the sky....

I couldn't agree more. Space movies can be about something more than explosions.

I recently made a short 'space' film with neither explosions or aliens...or even a destination... just two guys trapped in a spaceship that was actually designed for monkeys.

Search youtube for "The Tiny Spaceship"

...or click on my name to go to the link (if it works)

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 08:12 PM

Please change the title

The movie hasn't even been released throughout the country yet (Yet to arrive here in DC) and you're posting a spoiler laden interview... with no warning... and injected it into the title?

I hate to sound selfish but this is the one good SciFi movie that comes around every two years (Sunshine in 07, Serenity 05) and now the thrust of the entire movie is compromised.

Please have some compassion for us and change the title and add a spoiler warning.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:27 PM

I'll finish reading this when I've seen the movie

Spoilers ahoy!

Thursday, June 11, 2009 05:07 AM

I agree: this article is rotten with Spoilers.

Fortunately I stopped reading at the first sign of a spoiler, but I saw enough. Please be more circumspect next time, Ms. Shamberg.

However, nothing was worse than Bernard Drew's review of "Alien," which I read as a naive 16 year-old. (If you've never seen "Alien," stop reading now). Would you believe that Drew actually revealed that the baby alien burst out of John Hurt's chest? Not even the rest of the cast knew that when they filmed it. Way to go, Drew, you A-hole. (He's dead, BTW, so his days of ruining movies for others are over).

Thursday, June 11, 2009 05:09 AM

Overlooked smart recent SF movie: "Sunshine."

If you're looking for a smart SF movie, check out Danny Boyle's 2007 film, "Sunshine." It didn't do too well, but it ranks up there with the more thoughtful SF movies, and was not too reliant upon special effects (though the effects were impressive).

Thursday, June 11, 2009 07:39 AM

This has already been said, but SERIOUSLY, what's with the spoilers?

I stopped reading after this clumsy spoiler: "At first I thought they were going to try to kill each other, but that seemed too easy. They almost become brothers up there."

You've ruined this movie for enough of us, so PLEASE change the title. And next time, try omitting the spoilers all together. This was unbelievably inconsiderate.

Thursday, June 11, 2009 08:48 AM

Pop Music

It's funny, David Bowie is mentioned for obvious reasons, but it seems like pop music has a song that addresses the themes of this movie much more closely, and that's Rocket Man. I believe Elton and Bernie in turn based their song on a Ray Bradbury story. Let's look at some lyrics:

"I miss the Earth so much, I miss my wife/it's lonely out in space/on such a timeless flight"..."And all the science I don't understand/it's just my job five days a week"

Thursday, June 11, 2009 09:41 AM

Great review, Caitlin!

It made me want to see the movie - unlike an O'Hehir's review that tells nothing more than his reaction to the "atmosphere" - and with far too many words at that. Spoilers? you mean some little points of plot? Hey you others! Movies aren't one liners! Just continue what you've been doing Ms Shamberg, in this age of media overproduction, enough will appreciate it to provide a career.

Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:28 AM

"Despite the obvious HAL comparisons..."

"Despite the obvious HAL comparisons, we learn very early on that Gerty is devoid of human emotion..."

HAL's problem was not that he had developed emotional attachments to people or events that clouded his judgement. His problem was that he had two conflicting sets of orders at the highest level - one set to preserve and protect humans at all cost, and another (secret) set to preserve the mission at all costs. When the two orders came into direct conflict, HAL's apparent behavior seemed erratic and illogical to the crew, who were not aware of the second set of orders. HAL was simply trying to do the best he could given a paradoxical situation.

Thursday, June 11, 2009 05:56 PM

2001

Kubrick was a TRUE genius. What other sci fi, or ANY film, can you think of that is so well thought out in its speculation?

Instead we get the same warmed over space opera gruel over and over and over. Term 3, Star Speck 17, Star Crap 6.

Intellectual rigor, and honest scripts are really one in a million. I guess cause most people watching movies are considered stupid or something.

Friday, June 12, 2009 12:28 PM

sorry to be a hater

but you pretty much spoiled the whole plot without advance warning. i was really looking forward to the mystery of this flick.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
417

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
185

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon