- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Yes, it is ridiculous to compare what I am doing to protestors who truly put their lives on the line - just as it is truly absurd to think this game gives kids any real sense of the experience of warfare. That the immediate audience is limited is meaningless. How many diners were in the restaurant when a few blacks decided to sit down? How many were there witnessing the Boston Tea party? You get my point - the idea of the act is often of larger significance than the act itself. Getting press becomes part of the work and is a typical strategy of every activist organization under the sun.
The above considered, I would, however, make a strong defense of using Internet based environments for protest activities. As the web takes on further significance as a focus for human social interaction - (similar to the local shopping mall in the sense that this is the only place in most cities you still find large groups of people out of their cars) if you will - it is valid to consider such an arena as the Internet and computer games as new types of public spaces.
Granted, although one takes about as much risk protesting in a pretend game as on does killing or being killed, conducting this protest/memorial has very real risks (on the lower end of the scale I have been flamed viciously on various blogs, on the more frightening end of things I have been threatened with violence).
Finally, of interest to me is the complete anonymity of gamers, bloggers and letter writers to Salon alike. Quite curious - I have intentionally used my full name, provide a link to my website in this type of context. Are we having a real debate if all is anonymous? Perhaps off subject although if you are questioning my protest because it is online and on some level fake and/or cowardly - what does this say about what we are engaged in using this forum?
