This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, September 16, 2006 12:00 AM

Virtually dead in Iraq

To protest the war in Iraq, a media artist infiltrates the U.S. Army's popular online video game and gets himself shot. While angry gamers, soldiers and even some peace activists call him a nuisance, others say his message hits home.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, September 19, 2006 02:27 PM

    Meet the Well-Conditioned Minds of Our Future: The Conliberals!

    "Our government may be wasting money and lives with its war, but the military's role is far greater and more important than simply that." You kinda make wasting lives seem like a minor concern there, kid. Your letter strikes me as a schizophrenic mish-mosh of trying to come off as NOT right-wing while espousing some fairly right-wing sentiments.

    See, all this time I've been wondering: if so many people claim to be against the war, how come Bush is still in office and even seems to be gearing up for more mischief in Iran? Yeah, I was scratching my head over that one. Well, folks, maybe now we have an answer to that: Conliberals! They pay lip-service to certain Liberal ideals (the whole PC shebang), while displaying extremely Conservative reflexes! Witness dear Chloe testifying that she has no 'illusions about the glories of our military' (a very Lefty sarcasm, that), yet, immediately afterwards she falls back on that hoariest of Republican riffs about our military having a job to do, etc. Anybody who protests a war that even Chloe herself doesn’t even seem too thrilled about is some kind of whiner, in her book. Which reminds me of one of Donny R.’s favorite catch-phrases: Get over it! (Get a life, you whiney, freako, loud-mouth loser trouble makers! Nobody likes YOU anyway!)

    Chloe, if you agree that this Iraq thing sucks, doesn’t it bother you at all that people on both sides are getting their heads blown off over it? Or are all those people expendable in your book? Are you saying that people should enlist in the military and just kinda hope the war they get is a good one? And if the one they get is a bad one, and they have to lose an arm or their sight or their extremely precious lives over a senseless mistake (or a nefarious plot), they should go along with it so people like you at home don’t get, like, exasperated with ‘em? And this goes for their grieving mom and dad and siblings and wife (or husband) and kids, too? Just, like, a shut up you whiners and don’t make trouble kinda thing?

    Christ, I'm FINALLY starting to understand you m------f-----s!

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
275

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon