- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
The article was extremely difficult to read and understand because the author can't write.
His mispelled words, dangling participles, long diatribes, and conflicting verb tenses within his sentence structure make reading the Gibson tirade a heavy burden. I would suggest if the author has a point to make, he make it clearly and quickly. First and foremost, he writes about Mel Gibson totally out of context by excluding his life, personality and accomplishments. Mel Gibson has worked for many years as first an aspiring actor, reaching notable roles, and graduating to more responsible positions as producer/director. The American and international public have a very favorable image of Gibson which, in most venues, is considered positive; Although he may have a drinking problem, the author has mistakenly used this DUI incident to promote his own liberal, anti-Bush views. In short, the article was not worth reading.
It was all opinionated b.s. Peter Dempsey
