Read other letters about this article
What an ugly, insipid excuse for an article. No, Stewart did not suck and many of your "awards" don't have a clear winner, which just further illustrates a lack of substance in your "work." Stewart was just fine, and breathed some life into the event, and can't be expected to get too crazy with the restrictions of the Academy placed upon him.
Your article seems to be the one patting itself on the back, for cattiness and bitchiness - there, I said it, feel better?