Letters to the Editor
-
JUST LIKE I AND OTHER MEN SAY
Sumner's wife gave her opinion and sumner dropped Cruise.
Women have more influence over society than they let on.
If GWB's wife refused him sex, things would be mighty different in the world today.
But as it is, since she stands to gain a lot from GWB's illegal ventures, she accepts, endorses, even encourages his behavior. She is his enabler.
In this way, MOST women with significant social standing are ALL ENABLERS of the society we live in today.
So why do feminists keep blaming ALL MEN for the state of the world when in reality it is the women who continue to like things the way they are and to steer society in certain directions?
'Talk to the hand' is all I can say.
I am sick of being part of the sex blamed for the world's problems when it is the women who are the secret power behind the throne in most cases.
In fact I challenge women to tell me of cases where SPECIFIC men do things in opposition to the beliefs of SPECIFIC women in their lives. You cannot find many examples.
Brightstar The Awesome
-
Women the secret power
WTF?
-
Brightstar
The decision to drop Tom Cruise does not have a major impact on the future of the world, except for maybe sequels to The War of the Worlds.
-
So brightstar, does that mean if we tell your s.o. to shut you up, that'll be the end of you?
Please say it's true? All we have to do is get your s.o. of the female gender to tell you to zip it, and we'll be rid of your ranting and raving?
Ah, one can dream...
-
that would mean brightstar *has* an s.o....
which is very very hard to believe, and if it is true, my sympathies go to her in her time of hardship, having to put up with such an apparant blowhard (with serious anger issues).
-
WHITNEY!!
Glad to see the Whitney is back sans the Bobby. May she continue to hit the high notes and better luck next time with choosing a hubby. No one can sing like my girl!!
-
Well...ANYONE can buy a blowup doll, can't he? Even brightstar...
(ducking!!)
LOL!
Sorry Brightstar, you're too easy a target!!
-
Dimbulb
It is well documented that Laura Bush's politics are little akin to her husband's.
-
Brightstar 101.
Everyone who reads the letters responding to Salon's Broadsheet is all too familiar with Brightstar. He's a self-described fat, unattractive, well-heeled, single man who is only interested in gorgeous, large-breasted, nubile young women. He hangs out at strip clubs and he's bitter because the gorgeous, large-breasted, nubile young women he meets at the clubs are only interested in getting their hands on some of his money.
He reserves for himself the right to be picky about the looks of those with whom he has sex. He is angry that women are allowed to turn him down for sex on the basis of his looks. He sees no hypocrisy there.
He seems to brand any woman who refuses to have sex with him a feminist. He spews most of his vitriol on feminists (without having a clue what the term "feminist" means). His habit of equating feminists with women who turn him down for sex probably allows him to pretend the rejections he gets are not about him.
He would probably deny owning a blow-up doll because that wouldn't be nearly as much fun as resenting women who refuse to have sex with him. It has been repeatedly suggested that he pay for sex, but that makes him more livid.
-
Brightstar: An Elaborate Spoof
There is absolutely no possibility, no possibility whatever, that Brightstar earnestly means the things that he (she?) says. I call BS. Brightstar is an elaborate hoax, and probably someone's psychology undergraduate project.
-
THE LAST TWO LETTERS ARE BOTH WRONG, QUITE WRONG
but what else is new? Women never feel the need to be accurate about how they describe someone they disagree with.
NOW, onto the business end of my post:
I've stated numerous times in my past posts, I believe men and women are equal. I was raised to believe this. I take that as a mandate to make sure men get the same benefits in society that women are entitled to including REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS which men currently do not have.
I use the same rhetoric, sterotyping, exaggeration, fact inventing, namecalling, put downs, self aggrandizement, whining and generalizing that feminists use when they argue with men. It sure pisses them off to no end too to see their own weapons being used against them. That, and since I refuse to back down that gets them even more pissed off because they know they cannot control me like they can the men taround them that just want to get into their pants.
If I have valid points to make, nobody would know, because society and women in general deny all men the right to an opinion that does not square with the currently accepted politically correct line of BS, I men, thinking.
Also, men are not supposed to have needs nor should they ever complain, men exist only to serve women.
And forget about men being granted the same latitude and freedom to live free of stereotypical expectations foisted on them by women around them. Only women get to decide how to live their lives.
And if a woman complains to a man, the man often feels like wanting to do something to ease the situation, andn often does do something. This does not happen in reverse, women feel no need to ever listen to men, nor to help men.
And do not get me started on how much of a disadvantage I, as a male raised to be a good person, am nearly a eunuch because I never learned from church, school or my mom that being a good man means not only finishing last, but not even being in the race for women, since women refuse to admit that MOSTLY they are not only not attracted to good kind men, but are actively repulsed by them, preferring the company of bad irresponsible men who they can complain about to their girlfriends, and formerly to me. The sex is apparently supposed to be better or something.
I can tell you more, but you must stop mischaracterizing me first.
-
The "Psychology Project Letter" Anonymous Says:
I should have picked a pseudonym to distinguish myself, but as long as we're saying:
>THE LAST TWO LETTERS ARE BOTH WRONG, QUITE WRONG
>but what else is new? Women never feel the need to be accurate about how they describe someone they disagree with.
, I may as well inform you that if you want to describe _me_ accurately, you might want to describe me as a man.
