Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Paul Dirks

Published Letters: 2413
Editor's Choice: 7

Thursday, June 7, 2007 08:51 AM

@bucky1

I enjoy reading your posts and want you to continue to participate, but in this particular argument, your viewpoint has an unfortunate disadvantage in that it's just plain wrong.

Wal-Mart is indeed as much an enemy of freedom as the FDA and for similar reasons. It doesn't need to violate the law in order to be so. It merely has to provide an environment where people are sheilded from accountability for their actions and can thus act without moral constraints. Corporations and Governments share that trait. In Wal-Marts case, they manage to parley their role as the only large employer in many rural areas in order to corner the labor market and shaft their employees by discoraging them from being full-time and thus gaining the benefits one normally associates with gainful employment. It not an accident that to this day, there is only one Wal-Mart in Chicago.

Thursday, June 7, 2007 09:55 AM

sigh....

But, I do not see using government to punish them simply because I dislike them so much

Are zoning ordinances and minimum wage laws "punishment" or are they simply ways that communities impose standards of behavior on their otherwise disembodied neighbors?

Thursday, June 7, 2007 10:08 AM

great link

More highlites from LWM's link

Money that government touches spontaneously combusts, destroying the economy. Money retained by individuals grows the economy, even if literally burnt

The "Party of Oxymoron": "Individualists unite!"

Spiritually baptize the deceased as libertarians because they cannot protest the anachronism: Locke, Smith, Paine, Jefferson, Spooner, etc.

Inviolate private property is the only true measure of freedom. Those without property have the freedom to try to acquire it. If they can't, let them find somebody else's property to complain on.

Thursday, June 7, 2007 10:33 AM

I don't know how to break this to you..

But that monopoly on the use of force your so worried about....

Has been outsourced: http://www.blackwaterusa.com/

Thursday, June 7, 2007 10:40 AM

The libertarian's nightmare.

When corporations have their own armies....

Our thousands of highly specialized global stabilization professionals form the backbone of our consulting and services support capabilities. Blackwater Global Stability Solutions approaches every challenge with focused analysis. We pride ourselves on providing solutions that are practical, economical, timely and effective.

http://www.blackwaterusa.com/securityconsulting/

Thursday, June 7, 2007 11:22 AM

More euphemism....operator?

Every operator needs this base system I-O Tactical LB Vest The Blackwater Gear I-O LB Vest is our base system for custom tailoring a kit for any operator. All Blackwater Gear pieces work together with this vest system, allowing infinite configurability.

http://proshop.blackwaterusa.com/istar.asp?a=6&id=2301!BWG&csurl=%2Fistar%2Easp%3Fa%3D3%26dept%3DBWG%26sortby%3D%26numperpage%3D16%26pos%3D80%26

Thursday, June 7, 2007 12:40 PM

Circular self-reference

The absence of government is not the absence of societal organization. Most libertarians believe that societal organization arises automatically.

Oddly enough, the societal organization that arises automatically IS government. Environmentalists often make the same mistake. They assume that there is some "natural" state that would be acheived if it weren't for all the meddling of humans. Trouble is, we humans are no more or less a part of nature than any other element and that includes such things as the Federal Reserve Bank or the Gulag ot the Grand Canyon.

The innovation that the US (used to) represent is the idea that governments are instituted by men and require their continued consent in order to operate justly. Of course that insight highlights clearly just why imposing "democracy" from outside a society using guns and humvees is a recipe for disaster.

Thursday, June 7, 2007 01:12 PM

@Bucky1

FYI - Gary North was one of the main proponents of the idea that the Y2K bug was a herald of the apocalypse. My next door neighbor even went so far as to build a shelter, install a hand-pump well and carved out a portion of his yard to grow food.

Thursday, June 7, 2007 01:36 PM

@Karen

Don't forget to visit their "ProShop"

http://proshop.blackwaterusa.com/istar.asp?a=3&dept=LOGO

I personally find the Christmas tree ornament particularly charming.

Thursday, June 7, 2007 02:04 PM

My objection stands....

an extraordinary institution cannot arise “naturally”, as the outcome of voluntary contractual agreements among individual property owners

Just because the individual property in question was muskets doesn't make it any less "natural"

Not quite related:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

Thursday, June 7, 2007 03:01 PM

Quoting from LWM's pandagon link....

And as corporations extend their control to people outside their employ, with DRM and increasingly prevalent, shameless propaganda and their own armed forces and even co-optation of the nominal forms of governmental authority, the truth of our next useful sentence becomes ever more manifestly clear, that sentence being:

“Corporations are governments.”

I hate to break it to you but this government monopoly on force is a figment of your imagination. If it weren't then Iraq would be totally placid as our soldiers would be the only ones with guns.

Government, like the value of currency itself is only held together by the consensus of the population to treat it as an authority able to settle conflicts. If that isn't a voluntary association then I don't know what is.

Friday, June 8, 2007 07:05 AM

Maybe its genetic.....

Our tribal natures combined with our newfound ability to occupy the entire planet has led to some fascinating but ultimately dangerous dynamics. Now if we can just get past the current age without blowing the whole thing up. Or (worse yet) ceding control to people who think that blowing the whole thing up is a GOOD thing!

Friday, June 8, 2007 08:59 AM

With apologies to my threadmates

I still happen to be in the process of developing and honing my political views. (I turn 50 this year, it's probably about time) For that reason, I find it ineresting to engage idealogues in discussion. I apologize to anyone who feels that this harms the thread.

Friday, June 8, 2007 11:11 AM

It's just another example

Of how having the cover of doing something for a "greater good" can cause basic decency disappear in a puff of smoke.

Friday, June 8, 2007 11:16 AM

Why?

Because I said so.

Shooter 0 for 2

Most Active Letters Threads

543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
508

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
434

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
200

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
144

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon