Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Paul Dirks

Published Letters: 2413
Editor's Choice: 7

Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:40 AM

And it shouldn't be illegal to be a moron. .

Otherwise where would voters come from?

A comment on process:

I happen to be a pacifist. I despise violence, hate guns and will do everything in my power to prevent war. As such, I am emminently unqualified to run the country and wouldn't want the job if given the opportunity. But if, by speaking out against violence and prejudice, I can cause others to evaluate their own views on the subject more carefully than they would otherwise, then I have performed an important service.

In a similar vein, Glenn is a libertarian (or at least has tendencies in that direction) On a variety of subjects, he is likely to address issues by how they relate to personal freedom. This may disqualify him for a leadership position in the FDA but if he can cause others to evaluate their own views on the subject more carefully than they would otherwise, then he will have performed an important service.

I personally think that our current approach to medications and drugs is broken and needs fixing. Much of what is wrong with our current law is based on the Puritan idea that there is something inherently wrong with feeling good.

Glenn position may be considered extreme by some, but it needs to be expressed or else the debate will de-evolve to a question of just how much "expertise" is required to run someone elses life for them.

Friday, April 20, 2007 09:07 AM

I can't speak for anyone else.

Among whom does this man command "respect and admiration"? I can't imagine that anyone can listen to or read his ravings (and that's what they are and that's what they have been for years) and not shudder with anxiety on the one hand or recoil in disgust on the other.

The sad fact is that there is a subset of Americans for whom he speaks. The good news is that the subset is shrinking. The bad news is that they have been heavily overrepresented within the beltway.

Friday, April 20, 2007 10:45 AM

Easy answers to easy questions.

BTW why is it no one had anything horrible to say about Krauthammer when he worked for Saint Jimmy of Carter.

Because his repugnance hadn't yet been as widely disseminated as it has subsequently. But for the record...Charles Krauthammer has ALWAYS been a creep!

Friday, April 20, 2007 11:33 AM

primarily a tribal matter, amongst the savage punderati.

And God help the intrepid explorer willing to study them in their natural habitat! I understand the place is infested with snakes, rats and other assorted vermin!

Friday, April 20, 2007 12:53 PM

@jack

I respectfully suggest that you quit digging.

Friday, April 20, 2007 01:19 PM

I didn't suggest that you quit commenting...

Only that you quit compounding the damage that your contortions do to your argument.

That you would read my comment in that manner and go on to suggest that I'd hit a new low when in fact, my comment was one of the nicest things anyone here could possibly have said to you, only further highlights the degree to which your perception is being clouded.

My condolences.

Saturday, April 21, 2007 09:09 AM

I just skimmed the post...

And skipped the comments..

But when I have time I'll come back and read carefully because I think what we have here is an excellent dissection of conspiracy theories in general. This kind of thinking is of course reasonably common on both sides of the political spectrum which unfortunately makes it rather easy to discredit a lot of good ideas by associating them with particularly bad ones.

This is why it's vitally necessary that what we proudly refer to as the "reality-based community" continues to pound away.

Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:01 PM

Conspiracy

OK..all caught up now.

What gets me about this story is of course how much it reveals about the echo chamber. Of course the actual theory is daft. And say what you will about Malkin, Reynolds or Johnson, they aren't THAT stupid. But they know that their readers are and they have absolutely no qualms whatsoever about putting this kind of stuff out there for the true beleivers to lap up. It's quite sickening if you think about it long eneough.

Saturday, April 21, 2007 03:06 PM

How seriously do you all take this guy?

He has been linked to approvingly by Michelle Malkin who in turn has been profiled approvingly by Howie Kurtz. Only 2 degrees of separation between a complete lunatic and the WaPo!

Jes sayin'

Saturday, April 21, 2007 07:28 PM

nabalzbbfr is off his meds.

Ignore

Saturday, April 21, 2007 10:50 PM

In what sense

In the sense that he added "Maybe not, these days. . . ." and linked to it.

This has been another edition of easy answers to stupid questions.

Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:33 PM

Over in Iraq...

This is how they deal with people who fail to worship the correct invisible being.

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- Gunmen in northern Iraq stopped a bus filled with Christians and members of a tiny Kurdish religious sect, separating out the groups and taking 23 of the passengers away to be shot.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/04/22/iraq.main.ap/index.html

One gets the feeling that our current troll would be quite comfortable in such a place. Except for the fact that the cold blooded killing ISN'T a morbid fantasy being played out on the internets but is as real as it gets.

Monday, April 23, 2007 06:58 AM

Don't overrate psychology...

The virtually hallucinatory mind-set of many of the people who call themselves "Conservatives" (or the sub-set "Ditto Heads") is a phenomenon worthy of serious study by social psychologists

Even what we regard as well adjusted individuals are in fact contraptions cobbled together by historical happenstance and evolution. That we are able to back away from ourselves enough to actually study the phenomenon just indicates that information and the desire for knowlege has a life of its own and we are its instruments. In the final analysis however, we're still just a bunch of apes flinging poo....

Don't beleive it? Read realname's posts then come back and tell me I'm wrong!

Monday, April 23, 2007 09:08 AM

I thought you were conservative?

Like it or not, the only reason people starve and go uneducated is because of bad government

So your suggesting it IS government's role to make sure people don't starve? Sounds like shooter's channeling LBJ!

Monday, April 23, 2007 09:37 AM

@e_five

Well your right on one point...

It IS all darwinisms fault!

(sometime you'll have to give a seminar on how to do all the special characters.)

Most Active Letters Threads

383

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
207

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
141

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
108

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
55

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon