Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 241
It was the Clinton Administration that failed to see the signs of a strengthening and emboldened terrorist network
Bullshit. The Repugs were and still are trapped in post cold-war politics. And it's proven by the fact that Clinton had to deal with the original attack on WTC two months after his inaugeration. Unlike you and your inept Administration, he had the class not to say the truth: WTC 1 was Poppy's fault.
It actually was Clinton who invested and strengthened the U.S counterterrorism channels - and it worked. (Unlike Osama bin Laden, everyone of the perpetrators of WTC 1 is rotting behind bars now too.).
Also,worth noting is the GOP Congress fought tooth and nail every last penny Clinton allocated for counter-terrorism in his budgets. (too busy allocating taxpayer funds for panty-sniffing witchhunts and kangaroo court impeachments).
Meanwhile Bush not only rejected Clinton Admin's departing knowledge-transfer and warnings about OBL, but went back to the same old tired coldwar foreign policy his father pursued,appointing cold-water academic Condolizza Rice as National Security Advisor for crying out loud, and ignored warnings from everyone from the Brits and Russians to the FBI and CIA regarding an "imminent al qaida attack on US soil". 2 weeks after that warning Bush went on vacation and came back to give us a "statesman-like" (per Chris Matthews) speech on stem cell policy.
We all know the rest. And how the taxpayers money and the military has been squandered on poorly-strategized ,poorly excecuted "war on terror" which has actually been instrumental in INCREASED world terror acts.
So bite me, monkey-face.
What in the hell does an academic argument about whether Obama would do worse than Bush have to do w. anything? I doubt anyone could have done worse than Bush but that's a side issue.
Your ignorant brethren made the bogus claim that Clinton set Georgie up for 9/11. Nothing could be further than the truth and several of us factually corrected the parroting toad.
Even the ones where I close with: "bite me, monkeyface?" :-)
Ladies, I'm no fan of Sarah Palin, but on the looks-sexiness issue, I think your jealousy is becoming a little too obvious. Sometimes, I think what has come to be called Feminism is not so much about equal rights for women which, in fact, already exist.....(ie: females are still not required by law to register for the draft as men are Can you point to a law that applies only to women?) as it is about in-fighting betweem the cute popular girls and the smart, not so pyhsically attractive girls.
Oh, THAT must be it.
How 'bout this. "The women" will all stop trying to be "jealous" of Palin if "the men" will all start judging her as VP material instead of how well she looks in a doctored bikini shot.
Deal?
PS - let me guess. deductive reasoning wasn't your strong suit in high school?
Wow SF really IS out of touch.
Don't you clowns DARE try to blame this on Joan.
As one of the disgruntled former Hillary supporters who "ain't over it" (less and less so too as Obama sinks as we told you he would) I can assure you that Joan and identity politics didn't influence us at all.
Hillary was the candidate who was QUALIFIED and had long mopped the floor with bitter rightwingers in sheer competence.
Whereas you clowns insisted on shoving a lightweight with more baggage than an cargo jet on the ticket despite every indication by any OBJECTIVE measure he was unqualified and would lose in a fkg landslide. And you did it because of YOUR identity politics, Ms.San Francisco.
In short please take a long walk on a short bayside pier and take as many of your "liberal" pals as you can,huh?
In case your parents didn't explain it to you, men don't get pregnant.
Well, "DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH" yourself.
At least you hit the real matter though. Men DON'T get pregnant. If they did, they'd be able to get an abortion at the fkg 7-11 and nobody would be even talking about it. (much less turning it into a 50 year tired political football)
Most women look a lot more attractive with their hair down. What you probably don't realize is that Sarah Palin is deliberately trying to make herself look less attractive,
Lol. She could easily look far less attractive w/o the er, liberal use of facial injectables, dermabrasion, botox, and "elitist" "homosexual" Hollywood hairdressers and make-up artists.
I've seen her "before" pictures with her hair done and all,and there ain't no comparison.
Anyway,let the lesson for NObama to be he should have nominated Giselle as his VP.
and the real irony is after doing all you could to throw darts in the candidate that would have mopped the floor with McCain by any objective measure andthat HAPPENED to be a woman and shoving the empty suit on the ticket, you now want to blame anyone but yourself
Won't work. Nobody owes you their vote, moron. You've proven the left as stupid and incompetent as the right always said they were by once again snatching defeat from victory's jaws.
Now FOAD already.
the lefty-lefts STILL don't get that middle America decides the elections no matter how many online contributions they make.