Letters to the Editor
ShawnWM
Published Letters: 1029 Editor's Choice: 4
-
yeah, that'll fly, Gary
[Read the article: Rev. Jeremiah Wright isn't the problem]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Yeah. That'll fly. Obama and the liberals telling all of Americans it's their own fault that 3000 of their fellow civilians were incinerated while 90% Of the Muslim world was all happy out in the streets celebrating it.
And if that doesn't work, lay on a big liberal guilt trip about race when Americans are paying 3.25 a gallon to fill up their tanks and praying they don't get a pink slip (if they haven't already).
Great timing indeed! Is it any wonder that liberalism is for all practical purposes extinct.
You guys are just SO self-imploding it's surreal.
-
Truth is inconvenient and Texas is correct.
[Read the article: The Democrats' anti-momentum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Obama does NOT have anything resembling a 700,000 lead vote.
If you want to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan, than he has a slight lead. (of course the vulgarians and black panther militia's of the Obamateer's do even if any inteligent and reasoned person can understand that is a disaster.)
This too assumes that there is no "buyers remorse" on those who voted for Obama early. I think given the ever-more imploding all the time characteristic of the Obama campaign, it would be quite silly to assume he'd render the same votes again.
Finally let's let go of that tired caucus crap about delegates being somehow democratic. According to the Obamateers "for the people" it's convenient to argue the Obamateur's delegates in Texas are worth more than the votes of the people when that's convenient - Similarly loser dinosaur's like Kerry and Kennedy (who surely have seen their LAST Senate terms now) awarding their states to Obama is all fine and dandy, despite the Obamateur losing by a full 14 percentage points in Mass.
If you want Democratic you have a full primary of Democrats in ALL states only and you aware the nomination to the popular vote winner.
If you don't want that than STFU about what's "fair" as you obviously have no interest in it.
Anyway, Maddie, I'm sorry but you're right. Once again the leftwing of the Dem party has cost us the election and this time they've unfortunately taken black voters who are usually far more pragmatic then liberals, down with them. There's no way folks here in soybean country will ever vote for Obama now , not even Democrats except the AA's and a few liberals where they exist in a few university towns - if they show up to vote which I doubt once McCain is leading big. College aged kids unfortunately are the worst voters to turn out of all.
And it's not that they won't vote for him because he's black. Please. Lots of black people have been elected in flyover country after all. But rather it was the race-baiting, the bogus charges against a black friendly Administration, the Wright stuff and then laying on a big dose of liberal guilt when folks are paying sixty bucks or more to fill up their tanks and with their homes in foreclosure is just not a good sense of timing.
The Wright thing is a big disaster with a capital D and I can tell you that nobody from Montana to Tennessee is going to forget it either.
Now go on "tom payne" put your vulgar slurs right here
____________________________________________
and don't forget to then login as manos and madame and do the same
_____________________________________________
-
Because, John Anderson the left cannot win elections on the votes of lefties.
[Read the article: The Democrats' anti-momentum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]About 20% MAYBE of the voting electorate identifies itself as liberal. Another 30-33% identifies as conservative hard righties. So right there you're outnumbered by at least 10-15%.
Therefore without the swing voters Dems won in 2006 and are certainly not going to get with Obama as a nominee, (Christ he's had to get record numbers of Republicans to re-register as Dems in Penn just to ensure he DOES lose) there's not even a prayer a hard leftie like Obama is going to win an election.
I mean how many times do you have to play this game before you get it? You want to convince people? How are you going to do that, by insisting people who aren't racist (of all folks for crying out loud the Clintons) are racist? By sticking up for Iraq instead of New York City? By going on a long liberal racial guilt trip as there's a net job loss of 85,000 every month and gas at 3.25 a gallon and climbing? You're going to convince scores of us to join you when you won't set foot in any pillars of the community from schools to churches to veteran legion halls. Right. We'll all meet at indie film festival coffee shops in Berkely and win over America!
You far lefties are like shipwrecked ghosts. You fight the same fight with the same failed strategy every time over and over and over and over. And over. It never changes. Then you wonder why scores of Democrats get disgusted and declare themselves independents.
And then you have the audacity to blame the center left! Unbelievable!
-
After all
[Read the article: The Democrats' anti-momentum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]That'll change things. Or, read he NYT article about whether Obama,a 'liberal" can change things
My how foolish can one get.
After all, Obamateur's been such an agent of change in South Chicago and Illinois! Not to mention within his church! And oh, yes, a uniter.
Better just stick with logging in as multiple alias and having a vulgarity contest with yourself, payne-no.
-
It's NOT just in law!!!
[Read the article: Do childless women make the most productive lawyers?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Childless women, particularly over 35 compose the most productive members of the workforce in any field/domain.
-
out of touch elitists
[Read the article: Nancy Reagan to endorse McCain]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]a meeting of the richey-rich's. Nancy Reagan leaving her 125 million dollar estate to endorse the lower-taxes-for-the-richest candidate?
Perhaps they can come up with a new campaign slogan like let them eat cake or something.
-
Exactly why I'm behind her. She has done this. I don't have to "hope" she will.
[Read the article: Clinton camp releases Pennsylvania ad]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Barrack Obama has never fought for anyone else besides his wife to get a big state funded raise. His poor constituents in Chicago were just as bad off when he left as when he got there.
Hillary has a record of achievement for poor and middle America.
This is why we MUST ensure she gets the nomination.