Letters to the Editor
ShawnWM
Published Letters: 1029 Editor's Choice: 4
-
Nonsense.
[Read the article: Some free advice for Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Nice job denigrating Howard Dean, that poor dupe who thinks all fifty states count.
You don't know what you're talking about. AGain. It made nice talk for the lefties, but it's hard to have a 50 state strategy if your fawners are going to go nuts if you step inside of a church or a PTA meeting, the principle places.
No real new ground was made anywhere.
Rather, thanks to Rahm Emmanuel and Charlie Schumer who took over when it was obvious Dean had plenty of rhetoric but no real plan, went and picked some areas that had been historically Democratic and recently gone Republican, mainly in the Ohio Valley. These were cherry-picked these races such as the famous Baron Hill v. Mike Sodrell in Indiana where
Southern Indiana, Kentuckey and Ohio had ALWAYS been Democratic and Sodrell had beat Baron Hill by less than 200 votes in the earlier race against him.
Dean did nothing. The fact that he and his adulators then went and tried to take credit for Emmanuel and Schumers work was nauseating. In the same way that Howard Dean and his dolts were always riding Terry McAuliffe for fundraising from big donors as if that were a bad thing, Dean now has the DNC entirely broke.
You fawn over him if you want. I sure won't.
-
@RBL
[Read the article: Some free advice for Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Sorry but anyone who wants to claim that the candidate they don't support should be grandstanding on divisive social issues that their own candidate says are irrelevant and tired, is just not serious about intelligent exchanges in my book.
-
The Obamateur
[Read the article: Some free advice for Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Obamateur is small-time crook and a bigot like his many positively looney, uneducated and trashy supporters. Probably with a freezer of Republican cash somewhere since he insists on staying in the race long past the point where it became obvious he couldn't win any big delegate states besides Illinois. Since Obama's supposedly "liberals" are tolerant of the patent foaming-at-the mouth racism and hate that has defined the entire Obama "Hope" campaign on the ground level since South Carolina, in a way they would never EVER tolerate hate and racism from whites, then they in fact deserve this inexperienced Loser and his rabid road show of loser supporters.
If HRC rewards his trashy, uneducated,foaming-at-the-mouth campaign by putting him on her ticket instead of classy hispanics (that are actually willing to work) then I will not reward her for caving in to it either. And I know I'm not alone in these sentiments by far.
Any "movement" this ugly, that is designed to appeal to the absolute worst intensity of uneducated rabble in fact deserves to lose big.
Ironically, after what I've witnessed here and elsewhere it will actually make me feel BETTER about Americans should John McCain win in a landslide which I am convinced he will against Obama by an electoral math.
-
The answer is obvious
[Read the article: Some free advice for Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]If it has become at all difficult to build on the remaining land, do the Obama's effectively get the benefit of having bought the entire parcel (no next door neighbor) without having to actually buy the entire lot? I'd feel better if somehow, the transaction made the remaining parcel more valuable to the Rezko's and then this is simply a good investment among friends. I can't help myself in asking these questions - I used to be a real estate appraiser, which we always called more art than science
If it wasn't advantageous for the Obamateur to bring indicted Resko into the matter he wouldn't have. What bothers me even more than that is the TIMING - at the time Resko was already an established fraud of the worst sorts under investigation where the Obamateur quite possibly would be called to testify.
Thus, it's not unreasonable to think that bribery may have be involved.
Given the ever more revealing shady history of the Obamateur, I would assume so in fact. The Obamateur in many ways is reminiscent of the governments of Africa that prey on their own people.
-
She has said no such thing
[Read the article: Some free advice for Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Now she is saying on the campaign trail that she would entertain Obama as Vice President.
Her husband otoh has implied it. I agree with you it's awful; he isn't qualifed to be VP much less President and it would put the security of the entire nation at stake to have this two-bit crook who shamelessly used posturing to the destitute of Chicago to obtain a luxurious lifestyle for himself and his loud-mouthed, arrogant wife.
Worse, it would be a smack in the head to the hard-working hispanic and white populist voters who have sensibly pledged their loyalty to an established stateswoman like Mrs. Clinton, as opposed to vulgar black racists who can only scream low-rent slurs and insist their entitled to foist an unqualified politician on the nation.