Letters to the Editor
ShawnWM
Published Letters: 1029 Editor's Choice: 4
-
@OrbitBoy
[Read the article: Obama's got ground game]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Why can't you see that derogatory nicknames like "Obamateur" are juvenile and counter-productive?
No. This is what's actually "juvenile":
Besides your own engagement of nonstop rhetoric and name-calling and koolaid drinking, this:
Your own moronic insistance we all take on blind faith that someone who, while in a solidly Democratic environment, couldn't be bothered to make a dent in a single major problem his constituents faced (crime, joblessness, poverty, despair, drugs, etc) will now, somehow, without any details heroically solve far far larger problems in a predominantly Republican landscape.
Secondly, if Hillary's so clearly the better candidate, why hasn't she run a better campaign?
Duh. She's had to fight the right and the crackpot left simultaneously while the press tossed softballs to the Obamateur, who for a grassroots amateur, oddly came up with some astronomical stashes of K Street cash to campaign on.
-
Maybe if it were true but it obviously isn't.
[Read the article: Hillary at twilight]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Actually, my very next paragraph was about how if we are condemning Obama for his relationship with Rezko, we have to condemn Clinton for their relationships and loyalties to business men with equally suspect histories, Mark Rich, being one example.
Is there no end to your lies and Obamateur apologies?
Clinton's history, if you want to call it that, was merely in fundraising from Rich's wife Denise, a long-loyal Democratic fundraiser, not to Mark.
Obama has an long established history with a fraudulant criminal in Rezko and a very uneventful accomplishment record for his constituents at best.
-
LOL! As if Rezko and Obama's affair is "vague and unproven"
[Read the article: Hillary at twilight]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]What I was trying to say, I guess ineffectively, was that if we dismiss the vague unproven stuff about Clinton (and I think we should) then we have to also dismiss the vague unproven stuff about Rezko, at least for now.
LOL. I think the kook-aide drinkers have taken the Obamateur's audacity a bit too seriously.
8 years of a multi-million dollar investigation by a partisan hack found Hillary definitively not guilty.
Meanwhile Obama's Rezko sits in jail for fraud and embezzlement : including the property he bought for the Obamater's who personally asked him to make the deal for him.
-
The absolute worst of the left
[Read the article: Cleveland to Dennis Kucinich: Phone home]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Good-riddance to him too.
He is the worst of the extreme left. The white version of Barrack Obama. Always happy to grandstand on things he never has to do anything about.
He is the leftwing equivalent of the rightwing nut politician who campaigns about being "against Christian persecution in Jordan".
Nice act, but doesn't have much to do with running an effective government, and it only appeals to the fringes.
-
Now THERE'S News!!!
[Read the article: Obama wins Vermont]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Obamateur has been leading by 17 points in the Fruitloop State, and somehow he's a big winner when he ultimately takes it by less than 10.
Salon.com is the Free Republic of the Left.
-
I believe
[Read the article: Hillary Clinton makes her stand in Ohio]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]that without the orchestrated effort of REpublicans to vote for Obamateur in Texas, that Hillary would win it with as big a lead as she is in Ohio.
The fact that Obamateur can't seem to get a single vote outside of a black or uber-liberal district like Madison, Austin (or anywhere in Vermont) should be very very troubling.
That Mrs. Clinton IS able to win back the REagan Democrats and blue collar voters (that the nut left worked so hard to alienate for so long) is a testimony to her ability to be competetive against John McCain.
Obamateur certainly will be something McCain washes the floors with starting .. right away (as the GOP MSM pressures HRC to "drop out"). I hope she doesn't; she'll win Penn hands down and we'll need somebody there when Obama starts to implode, like say his Syrian connections become a little bit more publicized or say, his next visit to a foreign country to shoot his mouth off "off the record" of course about his REAL intentions.
-
Hypocrisy
[Read the article: Quarter of Clinton supporters would vote McCain over Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Oh, I see. So I'm "racist" because I won't vote for Obama along with 20% of the other people who won't that just happen to be white. But somehow the Obamateur raking in 100% of the black vote doesn't make those voters racist. What a convenient way for the uber-left to justify picking a lousy candidate.
Face it, Obama's entire candidacy was built around a speech he had no skin in, probably to get fundraising from some Syrian and Iranian donors which just happened to coincide with the uber-left's single hot button.
No way to pick a candidate and certainly no way to win an election.
-
Also
[Read the article: Quarter of Clinton supporters would vote McCain over Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I will make no apology for voting for John McCain if my choice is him or Obama. It will be the hardest decision I've ever made but I like many others firmly believe we've been left with no other choice.
-
@CDemby
[Read the article: Quarter of Clinton supporters would vote McCain over Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Obama was selfish, selfish, selfish, not to wait eight more years for his turn. He would rather, selfishly, make himself a
Exactly. Add to that that in his entire political history there is no evidence to support he brought any major CHANGE to anyone, least of all those poor sobs in Cook County where he was such an impassioned activist. Call me a pragmatist, but I believe the best indicator of someone's ability to do something is based upon their past performance and his is very dismal; not to mention leaving Illinois without one of its rightful Senators for almost four years.
So it works out perfectly for both Obama and the uber-left. He goes down in landslide but makes money in the deal (his real objective) and the uberleft is happy because once again they did what they do best: snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and take the Dems down in a landslide.
Nope, I'm not voting for that and I want no part of it and I will make NO apology for it either.