Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Chilton

Published Letters: 19

  • Everyone.....is now 'al-Qaida"

    [Read the article: Everyone we fight in Iraq is now "al-Qaida"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Thank you, Glenn Greenwald for bringing this change in

    how everyone in Bush administration refers to the enemy in

    Iraq. It is especially alarming to see military and

    NYT pick up on the same thing. Thank goodness for unfettered

    local correspondents on the ground and for sources like

    MSN which reports on same date of how V.P. Cheney has

    operated to influence terrible policies of Bush Admin.

    I have a greatgrandfather who fought in Civil War from

    Michigan and a Chilton ancester who came to NY in 1774

    and left for Canada because he was a loyalist. I think

    if any of these ancestors could have looked ahead they

    would be pleased that I am able to read Mr. Greenwald

    and there is such a on-line medium as Salon.

  • Interview with Helen Thomas

    [Read the article: Interview with Helen Thomas]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Dear Mr. Greenwald,

    If nothing else catches my eye in Salon,I quickly scroll down to find your column and I am missing it today, 7/5/07.

    I am going to get Eric Alterman's column in the Nation

    copied to sent friends by regular post. I think Maureen

    Dowd may be the liberal's Ann Coulter and I'm dismissing

    her comments as less than truthful or discerning.

    Thank you for the Helen Thomas interview. She brought

    back the joy of seeing a JFK news conference. What a

    terrible thing the assasinations of the sixties were

    for our country and world.

    Rosemary J. Alberts

    Rio Rancho, New Mexico

  • Aren't News reporters straight or supposed to be?

    [Read the article: The NYT's growing pro-war fan club]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    A neighbor and I were talking about out "take" on local

    newspaper, Albuquerque Journal. He said he was going to

    stop taking it because it was too 'liberal'. I said

    I thought editorial pages, except locally supporting 'W',

    were pretty balanced. He said it wasn't the editorial

    page he objected to - it was the news reporting. How

    I asked could 'news reporting' be one way or the other.

    Did my neighbor object to what was happening in the

    world? How could that be 'liberal' or 'conservative'?

    Now I understand from those reporters of the NYT who

    echo uncritcally the administration line in their

    reporting, how that can be. However, I wouldn't call

    it liberal or conservative, but rather true or false.

  • Gloria Borger/ Disappointment

    [Read the article: Gloria Borger & the media's reverence for Karl Rove]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    It was good to learn that Mr. Greenwald has the same

    regard for Ms. Borger's pronouncements that I do after

    cancelling my US & World Report subscription. For a

    while I thought Borger was only decent journalist of

    the crew; unfortunatly she's not. After Rove's

    manipulation of Texas' Bush performance and his

    use of phony issues to get "W" in White House and now

    this phony issue of Sen. Clinton being most vulnerable

    is way out of the orbit for a main stream Democrat.

    Mr. Greenwald has never disappointed me.

  • Other Feinsteins?

    [Read the article: Dianne Feinstein, symbol of the worthless Beltway Democrat]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I would like to know other Feinstein- type Democrats

    in the Senate.

  • US Military Role in preventing the bombing of Iran

    [Read the article: The U.S. military's role in preventing the bombing of Iran]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Thank you so much for posting this story. I have

    e-mailed it to friends who have felt W and/or

    Chaney might be tempted to carry out this threat.

  • Fry Friedman (figuratively)

    [Read the article: The Tom Friedman of 2002 has not gone anywhere]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    At JFK airport store, New Years 200l, I bought a recent

    Tom Friedman book to read on my way back to New Mexico.

    I thought a lot of Mr. Friedman's analysis then.

    But after the Iraq war began, my husband hearing Mr.

    Friedman on a talk show, asked who is that, said after

    I told him, said "he's an idiot". Mr. Friedman said somewhat

    recently that he'd changed his mind about the war being

    so good and come around to his wife's way of thinking.

    As Mr. Greenwald has pointed out, he's really not changed

    the point of his rhetoric. Thank you Mr. Greenwald.

  • Senator Clinton does well on Russert Show

    [Read the article: More about race and the Democrats]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I watched Meet Press last Sunday. I was shocked by

    Maureen Dowd as someone legitimate attacking Sen. Clinton.

    as Mr. Russert suggested. I will never read Ms. Dowd

    again from my NYT on-line. Your characterization of her

    in your piece this a.m. is accurate.

    I was ashamed of Tim Russert. I didn't watch Meet the

    Press when Bill Richarson was on, but my husband said

    Russert did somewhat the same thing and Gov. Richardson

    was not ready for it. But Senator Clinton was! Thank

    Goodness she is so intelligent and knows history! Maybe

    it was the better educated women who put Sen. Clinton

    over the top, but it was also the working blue collar

    workers in New Hampshire who always intended to vote

    for Clinton long before the empty rhetoric of Sen.

    Obama - which, however, is inspiring, but deeds

    count more than speech.

    I worked for Senator Kerry's election in New Mexico;

    I called many households to speak to the person

    registered as Democrat, mostly, it was a woman in

    a divided household. Often, if the husband answered

    he refused to let me speak to his wife. I am also

    ashamed of Senatory Kerry's endorcement of Sen.

    Obama. The only thing that is good about it

    for me is I no longer have to feel pain when I pass

    his old headquarters. If there is a preceived

    "Bradley effect" it has benefitted Sen. Obama.

    What little contribution I could make went to

    Sen. Edwards, but that support for Ewards was

    not to say I was against Sen. Clinton. I will

    be sending her campaign a small contribution and

    a message to press on.

    ;

  • Thanks for objective reality check on really was said!

    [Read the article: Obama and Clinton on Reagan and Republicans]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The voters for Sen. Clinton will be those working and

    retired women, young and old, who want the most experienced

    and tough person as president.

  • Thanks to Joan Walsh

    [Read the article: Making sense of Super Tuesday]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I have gotten worried over past months

    that Obama mania is invading all my

    sources of news and thought. But I see

    Walsh and Salon are still fair.

  • Buying Super Delegates

    [Read the article: The media's special relationship with John McCain]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    After Sen. Byrd of W.V. announced his

    support for Obama, I learned Obama had

    contributed over $10,000 to Byrd's Senate

    campaign. It made me wonder if this is why

    Sen. Dodd supports Obama because his campaign

    debts were paid by a contribution of Obama

    money. There may be others, but today's

    announcement by my Gov. Richardson of N.M.

    raises the same question. If Clinton money

    were used in this way, there would be an

    uproar that she was buying Super Delegates.