Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 616
Editor's Choice: 5
Well Notorbitboy you accuse me of wish Bush dead in my thoughts post from July 24. Here is my full post. Where do I wish his death?
thoughts
[Read the article: John Yoo -- then and now]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]
To crust, I too think congress should impeach Gonzo. Why they haven't brought perjury charges against him is beyond me. He's been shown to have lied to congress. His testimony was contradicted by others. Yet no perjury charges. If they won't bring perjury charges, I doubt they will attempt to impeach him. Even if they did, he'll never resign the office. He'll have to be dragged out kicking and screaming. He knows where all the bodies are buried and Bush can't allow anyone that might operate independently in charge of the Justice dept. Since Bush has his back, Gonzo isn't going anywhere. What's disgusting is after Bush leaves office, the whole lot of the criminals will live the rest of their lives on taxpayer paid pensions. We will be paying for them until the day they die, which can't come soon enough.
I guess in your crazy right-winger mind you think my last sentence is wishing Bush dead. That's a far stretch. I say we will be paying for all these criminals until they die. Because we will, they will all be collecting their pensions until they die. The can't come soon enough is not even closing to wishing someone dead. Typical right-winger always twisting people's words, also you never answered my question. Where is the proof that the Iranian gov't is behind the weapons smuggling? That was what I asked in my first and second post. You provided evidence that weapons were being smuggled into Iraq from Iran. Which I conceded. Yet you failed to provide proof that the Iranian gov't is the ones doing it. Since you know you can't answer the question, you instead engage in character assassination. Trying to put words in my mouth, which you know and I just showed never said. So don't bother responding Notorbitboy because I'm done responding to you. You are just like every right-winger that posts on salon. You throw verbal bombs, call people names, and never answer the questions people put to you. So go to websites more to your mental suiting like littlegreenfootballs and powerline. Go say how unamerican and treasonous those damn liberals are to your hearts content. But stop wasting our time here unless you are actually ready to answer people's questions. And when you can't do that, like provide proof Iranian gov't is behind the weapons smuggling, be a grown up and admit it.
Tedious indeed Notorbitboy. You still haven't answered the question, where's the proof the Iranian gov't is arming the insurgents? You haven't answered the question because you know you can't. There is no proof the Iranian gov't is arming the insurgents. If you could answer the question, you would of done so by now. I've asked 3 times in 3 different posts and yet you continue to not answer the question. Be a grown up and admit you can't answer the question. Oh wait, I forgot you're a right-winger. You can never admit when you are wrong, can you? So sad.
What's amazing about the whole memo-gate thing was that they were never proved to be fake. But what the right-wing does best is change the subject. So instead of people asking did Bush complete his national gaurd duty or not? The clear evidence shows he didn't, as documented by the Boston Globe at the time. They got everyone to debate whether the memo was real or fake. So mission accomplished, the story was no longer Bush's failure to complete gaurd duty, but Rather uses fake memo's in news story. I hope Rather wins his lawsuit and gets every penny he deserves. CBS hanged him out to dry, in order to win favor with the Bush White House. CBS deserves what they get.
Yes the media is practically naming Hillary the nominee already, why bother with the primaries? Chris Matthews was being obnoxious last night about it on Hardball. Saying it's beyond doubt now. I remember when Howard Dean was ahead in the polls, the media did the same thing. Saying it's all over, he'll be the nominee. How'd that work out? That's why I don't pay attention to any of this crap before the primaries start. It''s a complete waste of time.
As for the poster who said we will all be voting for Hillary if she's the nominee. I certainly won't. I live in CO, which will certainly not vote for Hillary. Since my electoral votes will be going to the repug nominee, I'll be voting 3rd party. Hillary will be a terrible president, she's nothing but a DINO. The best candidate is John Edwards because he is the most electable. He is a true populist. Hillary is just more of the status quo. Let the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.
I Can Tell You This
I'm not going to tolerate any crititcism of Hillary.
-- The Notorious W.E.S.
Who the fuck are you? People can write what ever they want hear. Want censorship of ideas, go to powerline or littlegreenfootballs. Hillary sucks, there what you gonna do about it?