Letters to the Editor
soon to be ex-subcriber
Published Letters: 7 Editor's Choice: 1
-
Al is an inspiration
[Read the article: Hurricane Al]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Save the planet-- re-elect Al Gore!
I hope he ignores the gratuitous insults aimed at him from the media.
-
Was the 2004 election stolen? No
[Read the article: Was the 2004 election stolen? No.]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]So YOU say.
Will I be renewing my subscription? No
-
response to gene
[Read the article: Was the 2004 election stolen? No.]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"I'll take all the whining more seriously when I see an equal concern for voting shenanigans and attempts at outright theft--all documented--on the part of Dems."
-- gene
How magnanimous of you.
I wonder why you admit there is documented "voting shenanigans and attempts at outright theft" yet you don't share others' concerns that our elections have been privatized and aren't able to be validated. Dems, Repubs, I don't care who is doing the shady stuff, I want to know that people's votes are being counted accurately. Do you?
-
Hmmmm Where'd his conclusion go?
[Read the article: Salon answers its critics]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Joan Walsh wrote the title of Manjoo's article is "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?"
I distinctly recall there was a "NO" somewhere in the title. That was one of my main problems with it, but maybe Ms. Walsh agrees that "NO" isn't provable with our unverifiable way of American voting.
-
OOps
[Read the article: Salon answers its critics]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I reread the first line and Ms. Walsh meant the title was of RFK's article, hence I'm still disappointed.
-
True2Blue
[Read the article: Salon answers its critics]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]You're a fine one to compare Salon commenters to Hannity, Limbaugh, and Coulter.
"I fear you have broached a topic which is simply too complicated to be understood by many of your readers." Sounds pretty insulting to me, "personal attack" is a good description for your implication that readers don't understand this "complicated" issue.
Disagreement is fine; belittling, not fine. The review of Al Gore's movie had belittling descriptions of his character, and that's when I decided not to renew. No science told Manjoo to belittle RFKJr, and that's what you did with your "it's too complicated for most here." I don't need to pay for that, I can get it free by turning on the television.
-
Hey Prince Ton
[Read the article: Did Al get the science right?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]If the US bothered to invest in alternative fuels and actually invent something that can energize industry, then China and other developing countries might be quite happy to use the alternative fuel.
Bu$hCo being OilBoys, it won't happen without much pressure from the citizenry (if even then). That's why this movie is so necessary. Like alcoholism, first a problem has to be faced.....I'm surprised Bush admitted that global warming exists.