What quislings like Hiatt miss is the fact that the previous government would have had to actually commit crimes for them to be prosecuted in his slippery slope fantasy.

Hard to imagine this happening in America.

Former Taiwan President Sentenced to Life in Prison

Taiwan former President Chen Shui-bian is seen behind barbed-wire at the Tucheng Detention Center in Taipei County, Taiwan on Sept. 11, 2009. Taiwan former President Chen Shui-bian is seen behind barbed-wire at the Tucheng Detention Center in Taipei County, Taiwan on Sept. 11, 2009.

Former Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian has been found guilty of corruption and sentenced to life in prison.

The Taipei District Court on Friday convicted Chen of embezzling over $3 million from a presidential affairs fund. He was also found guilty of accepting bribes worth $9 million in connection with government land deals. Taipei District Court spokesman Huang Chun-ming explains the severity of the verdict. Huang says the court decided to impose the life sentence on Chen because as president, he severely damaged Taiwan.

Chen was convicted of a total of six charges and fined $6 million. His wife, Wu Shu-chen was convicted of similar charges and was also sentenced to life in prison. http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/09/12/2009091200297.html

,

There seems to be at least 10 names on that list already. Can I get on the list? I promise I will accuse Glenn of being a self hating Jew! I'll tell you where to send the money later.

Is there some point to your last post? Cause, I'm just not getting it?

The average American consumes 60 times what the average Indian does.

Most Americans seem to believe that they achieve this extraordinary disparity by being "number one!", the smartest, the best, the hardest working, yada yada. None of this is true of course, it never was.

The Truth of course is that America does so well because it steals. Astoundingly, those dirty wogs get upset over this and hit back on occasion.

People who point out simple truths like this are never popular.

Sure it's a simulation, a simulation of a building being hit by an airplane that does not have 47 massive structural columns in it's core.

Here's a simulation of the real building. Hint. The core remains standing, as it was designed to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZILQsCQsSXA

I don't have a lot of facts, but I do have a lot of questions, questions that have not been answered.

You sound so utterly certain with your blithe and breathless citation of some, apparently definitive and irrefutable, study by Purdue and National Geographic.

How many hours have you spent on this? Have you read any books? Watched any videos? Have you studied this question? Because I have, for thousands of hours, and the official story is a lie.

Your nonexistent "analysis" is right up there with the, puerile, sub-moronic "argument", that it could not have been Bush, because "Bush was too stupid".

Bush was stupid. Who said he did it?

Cheney is not stupid. Mossad is not stupid. PNAC is not stupid. The Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on Project Northwoods and they weren't stupid either.

So don't get all condescending and superiour, especially when you do so from such a fact free position.

At first I thought the fat guy in the picture was going for his gun.

It's his right, right?

So know that your arguing about what "experts" believe, proves nothing logically right? There are many "expert" truthers. Just as there are "experts" who believe otherwise. Proves nothing.

We need a new investigation. Are you against that?

I don't recall calling you an idiot.

Still it moves.

So know you arguing about what experts believe? There are many "expert" truthers. Proves nothing.

We need a new investigation. Are you against that?

I don't recall calling you an idiot.

Still it moves.

You will be Assimilated Steve.

You said at some point the intact floors would have offered "no resistance."

Yes they would, each floor would offer resistance which would have had the effect of slowing down the debris. The net effect is that without explosives or some other agent removing the resistance of the lower floors, the building would not have fallen as quickly as it did. This is London Lad keeps harping on that point, because it makes perfect sense according the laws of Newtonian mechanics. Your official version does not.

And yes, you can use a stopwatch to get a fairly accurate measure, close enough, if you know the frame rate. They are other more accurate ways, and they all say the same thing. Too fast. That's true for WTC 1, WTC 2 and the very mysterious building 7.

But there is no sense arguing with Steve, his mind is made up. This really is not the place for it anyway, if you guys want to take it to my blog, link at sig, feel free. You and London and Titonwan can argue away, Glenn is going to shut this thread any second anyway.

You're wrong Steven. No matter what you believe you should be screaming to see the missing surveillance tapes from the Pentagon, and wondering out loud and often how it was that Andrews AFB, which is only 13 miles away, failed to launch a single plane, even though CNN had given them nearly an hours warning?

And why did Bush sit there for, what was it, 10 minutes, after being told, "America is under attack"? Imagine Steve, you are at work and your wife calls, says, Steve, the house is on fire. You do what? Sit there for 10 minutes and send emails?

No, it all stinks, it's a cover story, not a report.

Project Northwoods was the seed, and 911 it's fruit.

Just to clarify, Gulf of Tonkin was not "provoked" it actually never happened! It's true, have a look, I don't think that is even in serious dispute.

While you are it, a look at other false flag ops such as "The Lavon Affair" should be very educational and interesting.