Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Rocky

Published Letters: 138
Editor's Choice: 14

Thursday, January 25, 2007 04:56 PM

Once in 86 = twice in 40?

I know that a once in 86 average means there can be more than 1 every 86 years. Still, I find it's no small irony that the last Katrina-size hurricane to try and wend its way up the Mississippi was Hurricane Camille in 1969. That's barely 35 years apart and reminds me of the 100 year floods we see around here every 5 or 10 years.

Thursday, February 1, 2007 11:29 AM

So why isn't the SEC running these guys down????

If the scheme involves buying and selling thinly traded stocks during a narrow window, it seems obviously easy to find out who is doing the pumping and dumping. Who bought the shares before the scam started and who sold within the window of profitability. Somewhere in there is the culprit. A specific entity showing up in multiple scams would standout like a sore thumb. So why are they being tolerated?

Saturday, February 3, 2007 12:35 PM
Original article: Software is hard

How long does it take to write a book?

Answer that question and you'll know how long it takes to write software. It's a creative process that does not lend itself well to management and marketing timelines. How do you know when a book is done? Probably the same way a software developer knows the software is done: the time has come to move onto other things. Until that time has come, the work products can be infinitely refined.

If you've written 10 books of a particular genre of a certain size and quality, your experience will let you estimate how long an 11th simliar book will take. You'll likely be very accurate but writing that 11th book is probably more than a little tedious.

Software engineers prefer to write code for new things. Invariably, this means the subject of their effort is something they know little to nothing about. Before finishing the project, they will necessarily become experts in the most esoteric details of their goal. How can they know at the beginning the many details they're going to unexpectedly encounter somewhere between start and end?

There is a huge and unfamiliar amount of ground that has to be covered between the beginning and end of a project. With a few decades of experience in software development, I've observed that:

1) It takes a software developer 2 to 3 times their own estimate to develop any new software.

2) It takes a software developer 1/2 to 1/3 their own estimate to fix software written by someone else that's already deployed.

3) At the end of any project, a software developer looks back at what they've learned, compares it to what they thought they knew and what they didn't know they didn't know when they started, and shudders.

Friday, March 2, 2007 12:24 PM
Original article: Ask the pilot

Differing perspectives

For Patrick's consideration (as well as that of other pilots), there are two kinds of flight-delayed travelers in the world.

There's your joe/jane average citizen with their joe/jane average lives. Those lives aren't geared to deal with delays; these people have things to do and a tight schedule to get them done pretty much each and every day. Getting stuck in a 1/2 hour traffic jam screws up their entire day or week.

Then there are those who's lives have a regular "hurry up and wait" component. This group regularly faces unavoidable and uncontrollable delays in what they're supposed to be getting done. I'd include military personnel, airline crews and astronauts in this group.

Delays the latter group can brush off with the kind of annoyance reserved for pesky mosquitos are delays that set the former group howling at the moon, God and congress.

There is some value in having a knowledgable and articulate pilot explain the whatnots and wherefors that make the this or that air-travel-thing not a big deal. At the very least, it temporarily diverts attention long enough that the howling dies down. More than that, I would not expect.

Thursday, March 8, 2007 07:41 AM
Original article: Porn free

Jeez

Can I sue for intellectual whiplash? The guy embraces Coulter and then complains there's no depth to the discourse. What a wanker.

Thursday, March 15, 2007 08:16 PM

Maybe they're getting traction in Washington

but Isreal is losing the battle for hearts and minds in the rest of the United States. That doesn't bode well for them long term.

Thursday, March 29, 2007 09:55 AM

Excellent

"They've got me totally paranoid."

Excellent!

Thursday, April 5, 2007 08:00 PM

Elections have consequences

A consequence of the last election is apoplexy on the right. That seems only fair. I've been apoplectic for more than 6 years now. It's definitely about time that I get to enjoy a little apoplexy on the other side of the now much wider divide. Let the entertain continue. Ms. Pelosi, you go girl.

Friday, April 6, 2007 08:00 AM
Original article: The GOP's secret weapon?

His health

His health hasn't interfered with his work as vice-president as far as we know. Not that anyone would suggest Dick might not be forthcoming about any health issues he's had in the last 6 years. You do have to wonder, though, if his holing up in undisclosed locations has always been him hiding from Al Qaeda or was he off being fitted with his latest cyborg upgrade.

Sunday, April 8, 2007 08:07 AM

Shooter - read your history...

and, maybe, you'd make more sense. Syria didn't invade Lebanon. Syria was invited into Lebanon by the international community. The United States was in the middle of leading that initiative.

Life and politics is a little more complicated than the RWA echo chamber wants you to grasp. So far, they're succeeding in your case.

Best of luck.

Sunday, April 8, 2007 08:18 AM

Their God?

They think their God is greater than ours, what do you think?

They believe their God is the God of Israel and the God of Christianity.

They also believe Jesus was a great prophet, born of a virgin, who did NOT rise from the dead (the same can be said of the beliefs of many branches of Christianity (though, obviously, not of the dominant Rome-based branch of Christianity and it's offshoots (among which offshoots you'd have to ironically include the Rapture Christians who believe the Rome-based church may be the whore of Babylon))).

I think you'd do well to stop thinking and start reading; you've got a lot of catching up to do.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007 01:44 PM
Original article: Compassionate conservatism

You CAN NOT count the number of shots

and make any decision about when it's "safer" to rush someone. Why? Because the federal assault weapons law limiting magazine capacity to 10 rounds was allowed to expire in 2004. The standard Glock 19 capacity now is 15 rounds. You can buy high-capacity magazines to increase that 15 round limit legally.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
264

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon