You are a pig because you obsessively stalk them on this (and I suspect others) blog. You say stuff like this:

"I myself aspire to it these days since it seems to be the only sure way to get you women turned on enough to WANT us men for more than conversation (booooring)."

And this:

"why do good looking women hang out with ugly women? So the good looking ones look even better in comparison!"

And this:

"Imagine a world where the one guy squirts onto a rock and hundreds of women line up to take a small sample of his sperm packet."

And that is just on this blog thread alone, Brightstar65.

You are creepy, a PIG, and you contribute nothing other than tripe that is intended to piss people off.

Like I said yesterday, no woman will ever like you, so find another hobby other than stalking women on Feminist blogs, like model building.

I meant to write; You are a pig because you obsessively stalk WOMEN on this (and I suspect others) blog.

Of course in your world the only acceptable women are slim and 10, so obviously you don't have much respect for "the diversity, intelligence, beauty, etc. that women bring," because most women possessing "the diversity, intelligence, and beauty" are not slim and 10.

You do speak for yourself, I applaud you for that, but you definitely do not speak for me or most other men.

I wouldn't call you misogynistic, yet, but you and men like you are a big part of the reason why so many women have a negative image of men. Please ladies (and girls), trust me, most men are not as shallow as shadow is, but you all have to be careful, because shadow is not alone.

BTW shadow, trying to make women feel self-conscious of their bodies, for no good reason, does classify you as a PIG.

There IS no good reason to try to make any women feel self-conscious about their bodies.

And not ALL slim 10 women possess the diversity, intelligence, beauty, etc. that women bring.

Shadow, only a decent man realizes that both statements are true, so you clearly are not a decent man.

So just being honest and respectful in your approach to women never crosses your mind?

You must be a very lonely person if you can't trust or respect women.

"Thats true of hotties---10's so to speak.

Obese, unattractive women??? No way."

You implied that obese or unattractive women are "unf*ckable." Which to an intelligent reader that would suggest that you consider only slim 10 f*ckable, and worthy of respect. Sounds pretty shallow to me, Shadow. Obviously you don't look at a woman's inner qualities before you make a judgment of her, and that is the definition of shallow.

You should be respectful and truthful to everyone (female and male), unless they have given you reason not to respect them, and you definitely have given everyone here at broadsheet reason not to respect you, if you are the anonymous I think you are. And your earlier comment gives me suspicion that you are.

When you said you would not sleep with an obese or unattractive woman. Or do you sleep with obese or unattractive women that you respect?

I am trying to prove that you are shallow and a PIG, but I think you did that for me. with this line:

"not sleeping with someone does not imply disrespect

or at least that's what I keep telling myself. har har."

Thank you shallow shadow for making my goal easy.

Consequently, the correct answer to my question would have been; if I was single, and I liked her, and I respected her, yeah, I could sleep with an obese or unattractive woman, if she want to sleep with me.

But instead you made a lame sexist joke. Thus proving that you are shallow and a PIG.

BTW you started this, not me, when you made that stupid obese/unattractive comment.

My apologies, still I almost had you. And I noticed you ducked my question.

I wonder how many David Vitter type politicians are clients of Alibila, and/or other such services? Perhaps we can have someone from Larry Flynt's office look into the matter.

I was impressed Franklin, good argument. Franklin nailed it on the head when he made the point that if you can make through the airport, without violating public decency laws within the airport, then you are acceptable to board the plane. AKA Smith nailed her argument when she made her point, based on Franklin's point, that these women were discriminated against. Why were they discriminated against?

Might it be because these woman looked Middle Eastern, and one of the women had a Middle Eastern sounding name? I think these women were harassed as part of an unspoken and unofficial racial profiling agenda on the part of Southwest airlines. Yes 9/11 was terrible, but racial profiling is un-American, and we have enough security measures at airports and on airplanes to prevent another 9/11 style attacks from ever happening again, without the need for racial profiling. Also how can we be so sure that next terrible terrorist attack won't come from a blue eyed blond, or someone made to look like a blue eyed blond. That was meant to emphasize a point, not to scare you guys, but the non-racial profiling security measures currently in place are designed around the point that I was making. Terrorist could be anybody, and racial profile leaves you wide open for attack, because you are not looking at everybody.