Letters to the Editor
Lame Man
Published Letters: 16
-
How do you really
[Read the article: Our broken political discourse]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]feel, Mr. Greenwald? Excellent post, as always.
-
Inspiring
[Read the article: Little outbursts of journalism -- what causes them?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]But slow and incremental progress of this sort is the only kind that is viable, and ultimately, the only kind that really matters.
Well said.
Anybody notice that even in this "disorienting" article, the writers still needed the standard journalistic peg of "...critics say..." in order to squeeze this out. I wonder - did the McClatchy writers need this dodge?
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: How much credence should Gen. Petraeus' reports be given?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really, we shouldn't judge this until Gen. Petraeus gives his report in September.
Lather, rinse, repeat. Lather, rinse, repeat. Lather, rinse, repeat.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Bush's 2001 condemnation of Russia's human rights abuses]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: A new low of mindlessness for our media]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: A new low of mindlessness for our media]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr Powell (at 9:09 AM), but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Various items]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
A basic question for your panel discussion
[Read the article: Mike Allen and Hugh Hewitt on the politicization of the military]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Allen, why are you so interested and enthusiastic about the communications strategy of the administration? How does this affect your work in informing your readers/viewers?
And as always - you raise some interesting points, Mr. Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Various items]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
(Sorry for the late posting. And, Mr. Greenwald, I just saw a response of yours from a week ago -- it's easy to lose track of these comment threads -- and I just want to say I appreciate your response. We are almost halfway through August, and I haven't seen any reason to stop posting this comment. I need another beer.)
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Various items]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until the White House *cough*, I mean, Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/016628.php
-
Bush Dogs
[Read the article: Warrantless surveillance and the new Coretta Scott King disclosures]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Many of you probably already know this, but the crew at Open Left (http://www.openleft.com/frontPage.do) are tracking the so-called Bush Dogs (http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=C1ED68AC1350150D31623298229B3CC3?diaryId=917) and their tendency to sniff President Bubble Boy's crotch.
Uh-oh! Was that too foul-mouthed?
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: The D.C. establishment versus American public opinion]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Selective defenders of free expression]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
this is annoying for a number of reasons
[Read the article: Jamie Kirchick's fantasies of the grave Muslim threat]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]but one of them is the knee-jerk statement about the "liberal PC police." Um. Kirchick's entire point is based on the comments of a professional nag. One might even say that Donohue is the "Catholic PC police." But his response is OK, while the supposed liberal weenie reponse is not?
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: David Brooks and the deceitful tactics of the Beltway pundit]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really I don't think we should judge these things until Gen. Petraeus delivers his report in September.
-
You raise some interesting points
[Read the article: Live-blogging the Mukasey confirmation hearing]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Mr. Greenwald, but really, we shouldn't judge these things until Gen. Petraeus gives his report in September.