Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

melthough

Published Letters: 1346
Editor's Choice: 103

Tuesday, January 29, 2008 06:03 PM
Original article: NOW, wait a second ...

AKA Smith

Thank you for offering intelligent repartee while I am still paralyzed between wanting to respond to these assholes and not being able to see straight because my eyes are rolling so much. Sometimes they are so over the top that I almost laugh. But then I remember that the hatred, if not the argument itself, is actually sincere. And that is SUCH a buzz kill. Anyway, in a year when I am disappointed even in Gloria Steinem, you are still one of my feminist heroes.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008 06:14 PM
Original article: I can't stop stealing!

I think you are trying to get caught.

And if you don't take action, you will get caught. Is that really what you want? Because it is inevitable. Perhaps you can take care of this problem by buying yourself some therapy with your own money instead of fucking up your own and other people's lives in an attempt to get them to fix what is wrong with you. Telling you to grow up is a bit on the harsh side, but it does seem as though you are challenging the authorities around you to call you on your bad behavior. That is a serious boundary issue, and you need to address it with a spiritual or mental health professional before you escalate even more and do something truly awful.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008 06:30 PM

rcastanon

Not sure how it works at Salon, but at most publications the writer does not write the headlines.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008 06:35 PM

Yikes, Farhad

I confess I was mad at you for a while over the whole abortion thing, and then the Ohio election thing, but generally I enjoy your writing and I'm looking forward to your book - especially if it's as hilarious as some of your longer posts have been recently. This room (the comments section) is almost as tough as Broadsheet's sometimes. And that's saying something. I don't know how you guys handle it. Maybe you can write your next book on what internet anonymity does to our basic humanity. Yikes.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 05:27 AM
Original article: John McCain is back on top

"He's well past retirement age."

71? What the hell are you talking about? That's exactly when my generation (so-called 'X') is planning to retire.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 06:20 AM

Bummer.

I guess I'll go with my second choice, although I keep going back and forth about who that is.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 07:27 AM

So, basically...

the Republican base feels the same way about McCain as the Democratic base feels about Clinton?

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 07:49 AM
Original article: Sperm on, sperm off

OUCH, DurianJoe

Your anecdote is actually a really good argument for the device over a vasectomy. And vasectomies aren't always the painless walk in the park they are touted as being. I know people who've had painful complications. The possibility of painful complications with this device may, of course, be comparable.

But golly! An electronic IUD for men? I hope it works without serious side effects. Men in committed relationships need more birth control choices. (Obviously, if you're not monogamously married or otherwise monogamously committed, a condom is still the best idea for both sexes, as they prevent more than pregancy.)

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 08:09 AM
Original article: Sperm on, sperm off

OUCH again!

DurianJoe, I don't even HAVE a sac, and I'm cringing.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 08:57 AM

@MAV

I just snarfed my coffee. Thanks for the laugh. I haven't had enough of those lately - especially at Bob Dole's expense!

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 09:04 AM

"I guess Obama is trolling for that endorsement."

Maybe, but it sounded more like he was trolling for votes from undecided progressives, in the absence of an endorsement. But maybe I just think he's talking to me because I happen to be an undecided progressive....

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 01:11 PM

um, factcheck?

I suggest you go back and read through Juliebird's statement again. She was explicitly pointing out that Clinton's statement came first.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 05:32 PM

Our system doesn't allow us to vote for what we believe in.

Don't get mad at Nader. Get mad at your beloved elected officials who gorge themselves on the status quo instead of offering us instant runoff elections, proportional representation, or genuine campaign finance reform. I do not plan to vote for Nader, but really. Please. You act like your vote actually means something to begin with! Nader is a huge reminder that it doesn't, and all you can do is yell at him for "stealing" votes from the corrupt, small-minded, utterly unrepresentational system we should all be tearing down brick. by. brick. No, the two parties are not exactly the same. I accept that. But they are enough alike that we never actually see any fundamental changes in our electoral system. We remain disenfranchised by our lack of choices in dozens of ways, and then Nader comes along to make people feel like they're actually voting for something that means something to them and you trash him and those who vote for him instead of acknowledging that no one - NO ONE - is truly enfranchised to begin with. No wonder this country is so screwed.

So, those of you who are telling me not to 'throw away' my already worthless vote? How about some ideas about what an individual voter can actually do to make electoral reform happen so we can all vote for what we actually believe in and get around to running a country again instead of just having horse races - I mean elections - all the time?

Whew. All that said, I am sad to see Nader presenting himself for punishment again. I do wish he would stop. But it doesn't change my feelings about the idea that my vote for president is somehow too precious to waste on someone whose ideas I actually support.

Most Active Letters Threads

505

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
291

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
145

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon