- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 3
I think that the points made by the author in the article are interesting, i dont agree with them all and i think he is basicaly redefiing the left right axis to suit himself as something no one else would recognise, however all this is irrelevent because of the cover.
His laughable excuses for the cover mean i will never read this book. I pickup this book and imedialty see he is intending that readers equate liberals with Nazis. If he wasnt why on earth would he have approved this cover, for all his talk of mussollini that isn't musollini's moustach.
So its just another piece of right wing propoganda - move on folks nothing to see here
Read it, read the last paragraph, am too a seriouse reader (sticks out tounge and wiggkes fingures in ears).
Point stands he approved the cover i dont need to read his steenkin book.
Not strictly in the rules but fly into hong kong and you can walk straight onto the train (in the terminal building its self) out in the central busines district and into the four seasons hotel on the waterfront without going out side at all.
in the moring you could attend meetings in the IFC2 building (lots of banks (3rd tallest building in the world) or wander around shopping in the attached IFC mall, should you so wish you can cut through the subway through the (MTR) train station (walking) to another block of shopping and hotels where you can walk completly inside to half of the major buildings in Central.
All this is air conditioned indoors and walking except for the train (but thats allowed right) , but would you have been to hong kong?
