Letters to the Editor
-
Bombs R Us
Very good indeed. The guy looks eerily like GHW Bush, too, adding to the effect.
-
The US Air Force:
winning hearts and minds since 2002.
-
That snapping sound is the gloves coming off.
I am in awe of this strip's painfully blunt message, and of Mr. Bolling, its fearless creator.
I want to plaster the sides of buildings and bus stops with copies of this cartoon. Who knows? It might help bitch-slap the U.S. citizenry out of this daydream of denial and into productive discourse on how to correct our listing ship of state.
-
50% hilarious and 50% depressing as shit
Just like life.
-
True words
Best. Comic. Ever.
-
DEMOCRACY... WE DELIVER!
It is all sanitized, war for mass consumption... the American Way!
Look at the flashes, marvel at the clouds of smoke...
F16s,F15s,F14s,F117s,B52s,B2s...
No B1s though... Reagan bought those but they suck
We are Americans, we love numbers
So why do we still suck at math?
If you look far away it feels like a video game!
Watch those explosions on TeeVee, say "Yeeehaaaa!"
Congratulations, you were shielded from a simple fact:
1, 10, or if the bomb was smart enough 50 humans were just killed.
Ain't technology sweet?
We love our technology, we are so smart!
Go to an American college,
Where are the American engineers, physicists, chemists, mathematicians?
Errr never mind, we are #1, right?
Don't confuse me! Don't make me think!
I just came from my intro to business class
I am going to be late for intro to psychology, gotta run!
They took 4 planes and 2 buildings went down
We cried like little bitches then
And we got oh, so maaad!
90% hit ratio, it is just like baseball...
We are Americans, we love percentages
So why do we still suck at math?
10% of 100,000 means that 10,000 bombs missed its mark
They are crying like little bitches now
But when they get 10,000 times more mad
Watch out because then we will get out remedial class in math
-
Sadly though
Americans love the idea of such a thing. Like my Liberal brethren who want to criminalize talking on the phone while you drive and who rabidly support unlimited police powers "for the safety of the children, mind you."
-
Anonymous 06:10
Aw, isn't that cute. An anonymous troll on the comics page.
criminalize talking on the phone while you drive
We'd like you to keep your eyes open too. This is a safety issue and as long as you get a hands-free connection, there's no problem. It is similar to criminalizing drunk driving, people don't drive as well while holding a cell phone to their ear and talking.
who rabidly support unlimited police powers
Sure they do. Lets make up some other silly examples that have no connection with reality. It is fun! Like the conservatives I know who all want to eat the livers of third world babies like fois gras.
-
Interestingly enough driving naked is a punishable offence
Yet I don't see Mr. Right Wing troll getting his panties all tied up over that infringement of my personal rights.
Love the talking point about Liberals, since it has been Liberals in power during the past 7 years. Oh, wait...
We are circling the drain as a society, and Mr. Right Wing troll is part of the dead weight that is pulling us deeper into the sewer. If only these idiots would all crash against a massive Karma telephone post. Never such luck though, these assholes will always crash head on against a minivan carrying a family of 6 who will die on impact while the asshole on the phone leaves without a scratch.
Right wingers sure love them Children and Life (tm) unless they get in their way that is.
-
Orwell, Oh well, All's well........... Will we have outrage?
The Past: Destroy the village to save it.
Yesterday: Invade them to give them democracy.
Early this morning: Torture to protect freedom.
Now: War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
The Future: Winston could not definitely remember a time when his country had not been at war.
-
Shouting at more than one person, in public
Is a felony terrorist charge, where I live. Thanks, soccermoms and minivan-ites. I love your protection of the children. Good job.
Why don't the fascists here outlaw speaking while driving? Because speaking is dangerous. So is turning your head to the side, and looking down.
I actually had one of you 'safety' ninnies preach at me how 'children' under the age of 25 should have restricted driving 'privileges'.
-
If You Are So Anti Personal Safety
Then perhaps you might wish to ingest enough lead based paint so as to spare us anymore of your inaccurate screeds.
"Shouting at more than one person in public is a felony terrorist charge where I live. Thanks, soccermoms and minivan-ites. I love your protection of the children. Good job."
If it is indeed a "felony terrorist charge" where you live, you likely have the good neocons in charge of this country to thank for that. They're the ones, after all, that have fanned the flames of terror since 9/11, leading us into such a wonderful war with their factual information, raising the terror level "threat" every time they want to prop up their beliefs or otherwise distract the denizens of the country from what they are actually doing.
BTW, I do hope that you don't take offense at my correcting your improper punctuation & capitalization in my quoting the above. I understand. The rock that you managed to crawl out from under still has your thinking a bit fuzzy after all.
-
Troll doens't even know that you can speak while driving...
It is called "hands free" you idiot, spend $20 on a blue tooth handset and leave us alone. BTW, all those laws you complain about were passed by your knuckle dragger ideological siblings.
Driving safely, like having good sex, requires the used of both hands. You will find out why once you graduate from driver's ed or have your first human sexual intercourse, whichever comes first.
It is a common misconception that humans only need one hand to perform complex tasks which shared among those whose only exercise of higher intellect has been masturbation -which requires only one hand-. You know how the old adage goes, "if your only tool is a hammer, every problem is a nail" right?
Further involvement with the human experience will soon teach you why evolution favoured a two-armed approach, simple, symmetrical, and yet so practical.