Letters to the Editor
-
friends
this thing continues to suck. My explanation? The simplest is probably correct: someone has had sex with someone else, been offered a inadvisable professional opportunity, and we are left to view, with horror, the abomination that resulted. This is the worlds ugliest baby.
There is no irony here (though it will certainly be claimed later) only incompetence and bad design.
But that is not why I have chosen to address you.
Has anyone else been struck by the similarity of awfulness between this and another grotesquely uninteresting but for it's awfulness expression of misanthropy: the editorial cartoon on The Onion?
It's better drawn, certainly. And it achieves a degree of coherence to which Kansas may only aspire. But it fits every bit as badly, and is quite as painfully unfunny.
Anyone?