Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

SB

Published Letters: 445
Editor's Choice: 19

Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:27 PM
Original article: Renting a womb

it's sort of a moot point...

Everything, that is. Let's see what happens in a few years, but as I see it, the future holds a dramatic reduction in human population, with or without our consent. Let's start now, by choice!

I don't quite know what to say to some comments here....

I'm not against taking care of the elderly at all, it's much better to spend our money on caring for them than, say, on bombs and bullets; one would hope that those who have spent decades poisoning their bodies with the various poisons our society offers will eventually be able to let go of their addictions while they still have some of their health. You know, quit smoking, eat healthy, exercise (if possible, I know some can't)

But ultimately, you gotta die. It doesn't need to be delayed for as long as possible at all costs. It just doesn't. Life has a 100% fatality rate. That's how things are meant to be.

Availability of education seems to be the major factor in how many children poorer women have, more so than availability of condoms. Not that access to birth control should be restricted. (and prenatal care should be available too, of course)

Since when is life fair? Learning that life isn't fair is one of life's most important lessons. Since when is China's policy fair? A one child policy in a country where everyone wants a boy results in what? As for population loss, it's defined as a problem by those who think constant growth is the norm. The economy and the population will grow and grow by a certain percentage a year until when? What happens say, seven generations down the line? What's actually wrong with having fewer people in countries where resource consumtion is high?

I just don't really get why, ultimately, with human overpopulation such a crushingly huge problem that feeds all the other crushingly huge problems we face today, folks have to go to such lengths to reproduce themselves. It looks kind of like an ego trip to me. The human family is just SO big right now, couldn't your individual family be just you and your spouse and friends for now? And if somebody's birth control fails then welcome that little one into the family? Or adopt from someone who didn't have access to birth control, or can't feed all their kids? (yes, I KNOW it isn't easy to adopt, if we look at it as an ideal maybe it will get easier) Not having to worry about bringing yet another child into the world every time you have sex with your loved one seems like something that shouldn't be so hard to look on the bright side of.

C'mon, folks, let's just ALL have fewer kids, just for a few decades! PLEASE!

Sorry if you don't like my starting the debate by suggesting that maybe the whole thing is a bad idea to begin with, but maybe it IS a bad idea to begin with.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006 03:54 PM
Original article: Renting a womb

Surely, there are ways to hire foreign surrogate mothers respectfully and ethically....

No, there aren't. It's inherently unethical and exploitative.

And while we're on the subject, a tangential rant:

Ultimately, the whole "fertility" business is inherently unethical. If you can't have children, that means you can't have children. The universe is trying to tell you something that you don't want to hear. I'm sorry, but life abounds with unpleasant truths. Adopt, or learn to accept that you simply weren't meant to have kids. There are many things that technology shouldn't be trying to fix, and this is one of them.

There are upwards of 6 billion people in the world today - SIX BILLION!! There is no good reason WHATSOEVER that so many people should be alive at the same time. 'Go forth and multiply', says Genesis, but people conveniently forget the rest of the phrase 'and fill the earth' - news flash, folks: IT'S FULL! We don't need more Americans using resources like nobody's business, we don't need more impoverished people forced to strip the land until desertification takes over, there are just too many people on the planet. It's just not right to spend thousands and thousands of dollars to try to make more babies who would otherwise thankfully not have to be born just yet!

Or maybe that bumper sticker is right, and I'm wrong:

Earth First!

We'll strip mine the other planets later!

Monday, April 17, 2006 07:03 PM

Go...

Run, now, don't look back. You don't need to ever even think about so much as calling him or answering the phone if he calls. Get a lawyer, get a divorce, get him out of your life. Next time he's out of the house for any length of time, take everything you value and crash on a friend's couch, even if you have to impose on them. Seize the day, and you may just find happiness.

Most Active Letters Threads

445

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
110

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
101

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon