Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Shocked and Awed

Published Letters: 2

Saturday, April 1, 2006 07:55 AM

So we all know he's a liar - what about the Congress that supported him?

That Bush is a blatant liar should be no surprise to any of us now. Let's rewind to 1999 and the easy availability of the website for the Project for the New American Century (PNAC)(http://www.newamericancentury.org/). Reading their position paper on Iraq - the one advocating a projection of US power into Iraq - and noting the list of Bush cronies who had signed it (his brother Jeb, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, et al) one could only conclude that GW shared this kind of thinking. Just after I read the PNAC papers I knew we were seeing a special kind of evil when I saw GW on a Sunday talking head show say, in his best evangelical sincerity, "I don't believe in nation building." He's been lying to us every since I can remember.

The Bush organization is precise, well managed and effective. They have been pursuing the agenda put forth years ago by PNAC for a scary kind of US authoritarianism. Bush's lies are simply part of executing that agenda. Here's my question: Is our Congress part of this organization too? After all, they overwhelmingly supported this war. And I have to think that if we mere citizens could tell that Bush was lying just by watching him, then our infinitely better informed representatives should have known that as well.

Bush should be impeached - in my book lying about a war is a lot worse than lying about a blow job. But it will never happen because our Congress painted themselves into a corner by supporting this war. The PNAC agenda is in motion and I don't think it will be stopped without impeaching Bush and the other leaders of his organization.

So now what do we do? Keep making fun of him? Keep proving and re-proving his lies? I don't think any of that is productive when we've got a lot bigger problem on our hands.

Thursday, August 24, 2006 06:09 PM
Original article: Like father, like son

The election is clearly a referendum on the war...in Iran

The mid-term election is clearly a referendum on the war, but not the one the Republicans want you focused on. The Republicans are banking that Americans will fall, one more time, for their fear tactics and leave them in control of the House and the Senate for two more years so they can expand this war, with Israel's help, into Iran.

If this happens, our country will be stuck in the kind of Middle East nation-building (the kind George W. Bush said he opposed in 1999) for the rest of our generation at an unimaginable cost in lives and other national treasure.

If the Democratic Party's leadership wakes up and aggressively positions this election as a referendum on the war in Iran, maybe we can keep this nightmare from getting any worse.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
372

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
354

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
283

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon