Letters to the Editor
dontmakemechokea#@%$
Published Letters: 33
-
For Warrantless wiretapping.
[Read the article: Jonah Goldberg and Glenn Reynolds warn of "social unraveling" if Obama loses]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]After the Dems take over the White House the unraveling will be in the GOP.
We will need the wiretapping to watch the terrorist in the GOP.
They will rear there ugly heads once they are not in power again.
We are going to need WW.
-
Social UnRaveling
[Read the article: Jonah Goldberg and Glenn Reynolds warn of "social unraveling" if Obama loses]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]What will the home grown terrorism threat raise to once Obama or Edwards are elected?
-
Her chance to change and learn were blown
[Read the article: Barack delivers, Hillary disappoints]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]She had that opportunity but she choose to vote with the Neo-Cons again and designate Iran's army a terroristic group.
She choose to vote for the NEO-CONS WET DREAM.
Is she a Neo-Con.
She did not learn or change. She trusted what Bush was telling her instead of finding out on her own.
She does not know how Washington really works.
It was reported Cheney was holding back the NIE.
Why. She should have found out.
Yet she voted with the Neo-Cons.
It was the beginning of the end for her.
She had a chance to stand up.
She went with the raging gang before and voted to give Bush the authority to attack Iraq.
Imagine if she stood up and said it was wrong and did not vote for it.
There wouldn't be a Democratic race.
So she didn't learn or change. The Intel Community learned and changed. They put the NIE out to let the world know Bush is LYING AGAIN. They were not going to be blamed again.
It's real simple. Don't trust Bush.
-
Tears
[Read the article: Obama co-chairman: Clinton didn't cry for Katrina]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]For someone who could not find it in there soul to apologize for her Iraq vote. A person that would then vote for the Neo-Con wet dream the Kyl-Lieberman bill it's nice to know she is doing ok.
Puhlease
Don't make me choke a #$@%.
-
Greedy Old People On Crack
[Read the article: Giuliani advisor: Iraq, Afghanistan a "triumph"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Norman Podhertz is the father of a whole generation of cracks.
-
So if he Broke the law Specter why is he not being impeached.
[Read the article: Republicans make Fox News sick]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Under questioning from Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), Mukasey said he “can’t contemplate” a situation where President Bush would assert “Article II authority to do something that the law forbids.”
Specter shot back, “Well, he did just that in violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act…didn’t he?” Mukasey continued to hedge:
MUKASEY:I think we are now in a situation where [that issue] had been brought within statutes, and that’s the procedure going forward
SPECTER: That’s not the point. The point is that he acted in violation of statutes, didn’t he?
MUKASEY: I don’t know whether he acted in violation of statutes.
Specter and the Congress knows he broke the law but won't impeach the criminal.
Specter had Mukasey but he wanted to move on.
Not one other Congressman took up this line of questioning and
Specter never went back to it.
If a Dem does become President I have no doubt the gop will show there true terroristic nature.
We made need the warantless wiretapping.
Have you watched any of there debates.
They are a blood thirsty hateful people.
-
Is Santa Klaus real
[Read the article: Blowback from the GOP's holy war]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Religion has taught me not to believe in fairy tales as a grown up.
It can get people killed.
-
Olberman said it best.
[Read the article: The Senate's FISA agreement]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The president's message in his State of the Union address calling for immunity of telecommunications companies is a "textbook example of fascism."
"Olbermann: 'It begins to look like the bureaucrats of the Third Reich trying to protect the Krupp family industrial giants by literally rewriting the laws of Germany for their benefit. And we know how that turned out. Alfred Krupp and 11 of his directors were convicted of war crimes at Nuremburg.'"
-
Kos
[Read the article: The Senate's FISA agreement]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]When I read the post on Kos I was thinking to myself, "How did they stand up? "
-
There's really no dispute that Bush broke the Law.
[Read the article: Is Michael Mukasey prioritizing the harassment and imprisonment of journalists?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The question: What are they going to do about it.
I want to know if any of the Dem Candidates will hold the buSHIT admin responsible for there crimes.
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/30/mukasey-specter-fisa/
Under questioning from Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), Mukasey said he “can’t contemplate” a situation where President Bush would assert “Article II authority to do something that the law forbids.”
Specter shot back, “Well, he did just that in violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act…didn’t he?” Mukasey continued to hedge:
MUKSEY:I think we are now in a situation where [that issue] had been brought within statutes, and that’s the procedure going forward
SPECTER: That’s not the point. The point is that he acted in violation of statutes, didn’t he?
MUKSEY: I don’t know whether he acted in violation of statutes.
Specter explained that the question was a no brainer, as FISA “expressly mandates you have to go to a court to get an order for wiretapping. There’s really no dispute about that.”
I would have loved to hear the AG's answer.
To bad Specter wanted to move on.
-
America is not China.
[Read the article: The WSJ editorial page lies about our surveillance laws]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Like all statutes, those are all laws democratically enacted by the American people through their Congress and signed into law by the President. They were enacted precisely in order to make it illegal for telecoms to allow government spying on our calls and written communications without court orders -- precisely because Americans discovered that telecoms had previously allowed unfettered government spying on our communications and wanted to make it illegal for them to do so ever again. Those are exactly the laws the telecoms broke, in exactly the way that the American people wanted to prohibit."
Glenn Greenwald
This is a law only a Communist would love.
-
The Terrorists have won.
[Read the article: Amnesty Day for Bush and lawbreaking telecoms]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Terrorists have won.
After 9/11, the Administration told us not to let the terrorists win. The terrorists' goal was to disrupt our lives and change who we are as a people. We were warned not to change our values and beliefs. America's victory would be that we refused to let terrorism shake us. We were hold onto the values that made us a great nation no matter what the terrorist did.
We Have Lost.