Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

yojimbo_7

Published Letters: 399
Editor's Choice: 13

Tuesday, August 28, 2007 02:39 PM

Whoa...that picture is worth more then a thousand words...

That picture almost says it all. The aide in the background looking on in disgust and shock. Craig looking like he needs a leather outfit from the Folsom Street Fair. He really does strike me as a chaps and nazi cap kind of guy, as opposed to a shoe tapping toilet man.

Oh my...the Republicans never seize to entertain. Sure some of it's schadenfreude but mostly it's the joy of calling a hypocrite just that - a hypocrite. Unfortunately while this produces a side show, Rome still burns and the US still wallows in muck of all kinds.

Regardless, nice work Glenn Greewald, these f'tards need to be called on all their BS. For fun and reality, it would be nice to see what some of the hard right winger nut jobs, like O'Reilly, Maltin and Coulter, have to say.

Nice reporting and blogging on this.

Friday, August 31, 2007 09:44 PM

No Mike Epstein aka "Superjew"?

Yup that was big Mike's nick name and he was a very, very good player and surely better then the bottom 2-3 on the list. While he didn't go to Dartmouth, he graduated from Berkeley...not an Ivy but a better school. He was also has a few World Series rings from the Oakland A's dynasty in the '70s. I'm not even Jewish and I hate AL baseball but I know this.

Sunday, September 9, 2007 08:24 PM

Aw shucks, Fast Freddie is just like you and me...except he'll keep the door open to the same corp scallywags and robber barons now plundering us

Hasn't the American voters learned yet that the "aw shuck" bit is a cover for hard line ring wingers ravaging the constitution, economy and pumping up the coffers of the rich? I'm embarrassed as an American that this scam keeps getting replayed and people buy it!

Holy hell, we've seen it with Ronald "aw shucks" Reagan and George W "folksy moron" Bush? Both racked up HUGE, GINORMUS debts and ripped at the constitution...oddly enough the stupider and yet more folksy one doing the bigger damage.

While Fast Freddie T is smarter then both, his lack of ambition (or faux) is a huge red flag that things won't just stay the same but will get worse. He'll be looking the other way the whole time. Or worse yet, policy will be run off a script like with W. except he's a better actor. If Fast Freddie gets elected -- we're f&cked.

Thursday, September 13, 2007 08:53 PM

My god...just in time for some '08 GOP presidental campaigning

"The first of those brigades will leave later this month, but the drawdown will reportedly begin in earnest in the spring of 2008."

The fact that the bulk of the pull out is being staged for spring '08 is simple kowtowing to popular opinion in hopes of salvaging a GOP chance at the presidency in '08.

Nothing wrong with pulling out except in this case it's pure politics and counter to the the original rationale to start the war (WMD, bin Laden, etc.) and the stated goals of security and democracy. It's pure BS with a bigger mess being left then before.

When the big pull begins look for a massive patriotic PR campaign, a declaration of victory (W in a jump suit again) endless pundits kissing GOP ass while the formal attack on the Democratic nominee begins.

Given the human toll, the TRILLIONS wasted and a bigger mess is being left behind -- W and his crew deserve a brutal kick to the groin. Don't worry this is a metaphor...and these idiots have no balls.

Sunday, September 16, 2007 09:22 PM
Original article: So long, white boy

The white male arguement makes sense

Analogy to Democrats chasing white males is the GOP chasing Latinos, Asian Americans and African Americans. In large part it's a waste of money because the GOP has no idea how to connect to this demographic without peeing on themselves. Also, these groups largely vote on the premise of empowerment and mobility instead of maintaining position as many white males do.

Using game theory the Dems have been playing "not to lose" instead of playing to "win". This is one of the biggest problems with the Democratic party and chasing white male voters is part of this. Once they can pull this switch of playing to win (see JFK and Bill Clinton), instead of playing "not to lose" the Dems have more then a fighting chance.

In the long run this is what the Democrats have to focus on -- the empowerment vote because ultimately it crosses over to even white males.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007 07:42 PM

send her to catholic school...that will cure her...

Okay, at age 13 it's too late but the point is there -- uncover the hypocrisy.

75% of kids that go to Catholic school rebel &/or ultimately understand the hypocrisy in the "god in heaven - go to hell" paradigm. Yes, the love of booze, football, rowdiness, weird fun and naughty sex helps the process but there must be something in the evangelical lifestyle that shows the contradiction in thought and belief. The LW needs to find that something and let his kid discover it. The uncovering of hypocrisy and the resulting disdain is the natural ally of every teenager.

If that doesn't work, get an anti-brain washing expert.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007 08:47 PM

why mention it?

I mean, did any of the media question Bush #1's, W's, Uncle Dick's or any of those guys on money? The answer is a very weak, sorta but not really. Is anyone going to question Mitt Romney on his money and influence? How about Rudy's law firm? If you're going to open a can of whoop ass...open it for everyone to enjoy not just the "homemaker".

Thursday, October 11, 2007 08:20 PM

Why not bring in the parliamentary system and put in some real campaign finance reform?

Seriously...why not? If you're going to change, change it all. With the need to form alliances and money put into a reduced roll, it could be a huge boost to democracy.

No longer could one wing of a party (say extreme right wing fundies) hold a party hostage. Instead alliances could move around them. Also the ability to turn out a no confidence vote would cut short ginormus errors like the W administration.

Most Active Letters Threads

468

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
150

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon