Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

yojimbo_7

Published Letters: 405
Editor's Choice: 13

Monday, November 17, 2008 02:00 PM
Original article: The Obamas on "60 Minutes"

about football -- it's the same thing when women talk about shoes

I can totally relate to the football comment of "excuse me". I live in the Bay Area and hang with the usual collection of artsy types, intellectuals and academics. If I'm somewhere and a college football conversation breaks out, the few involved literally say, "we're going to geek out for a few seconds, excuse us", and we give a dopey smile.

The thought behind this is, "yes, this is dumb, sorry for excluding you for a few moments."

The thing is, I've heard the same thing about shoes and spas from very strong feminist women.

Again, it's not about the subject, but rather the exclusion from conversation that gets the apology. It's called being polite.

Monday, November 17, 2008 02:57 PM
Original article: The Obamas on "60 Minutes"

@ Elephantman

Yeah, George Walker Bush reads...he was reading to 3rd graders when the 2nd plane hit the Twin Towers, and he just kept reading.

From there it went downhill.

George the Plunderer...worst.president.EVER.

Monday, November 17, 2008 07:46 PM
Original article: First lady got back

I like big butts and I can not lie -- this is article is straight out dumb

I'm all for ethnic pride. It's healthy, I do it. There's a little too much projecting here going on.

For one, how does everyone know your booty is as fine (or not) as Michelle's or vice versa? Okay, I'm kidding...I don't really care.

I mean why not talk about the Obama's greatness, merit and history making ability or is that not fun, sexy and enabling?

Mostly however, talking about the First Lady's butt (and your own) seems pretentious and shallow because there's a lot more going on here besides booty. Yes, it's nice to know someone has a booty like yours but you're better then that, and the Obamas are better then that too.

Beyond that, enjoy your booty while you have it. Eventually it will get saggy and old, history however will not.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:08 AM

I dislike Joey Liebs a great deal - but this was the right call

Let me be clear, Joe Lieberman is a slimey, self-serving, swarmy, duplicitous SOB. Inferring that Barack Obama and now president-elect was a socialist/terrorist is inexcusable. That stuff remains on video tape, forever.

Still, Lieberman does vote with the democrats 90% of the time. If he continues with this and helps create change, fine. Politics is a dirty business.

I'd simply use Joe Lieberman for now and when 2010 rolls around, back a real Democrat with a lot of money.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 09:04 PM

Goodwin Liu

Rising star, under 40. Stanford, Rhodes Scholar, Yale Law, constitutional scholar.

Indeed, if Bush can appoints youth, Obama should as well.

As for John Kyl, it appears Stevens just lost, so that's 58 Democratic seats. Between the moderate Senators of Maine, and perhaps Al Franken, there's 60 fillbuster proof seats.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 03:35 AM

Joey Liebs is a major league slimeball but he's now owned by the Obama and the dems

I despise Joe Lieberman. Someone really should kick him in the groin and throw him to the curb. That's my visceral reaction.

On the flipside, my intellectual and pragmatic side says differently. Lieberman votes 90% Democratic and his public thank you (and ass kissing, so typ of him) means the Dems and Obama owns Joey Liebs.

With 58 seats and maybe 2 more coming, and 2 moderate GOP Senators from Maine, the Dems are very close to a fillerbuster proof bloc of 60. Given this, yeah, let Liebs back in. The Dems will roll on the GOP.

Bills related to the economy, healthcare, the environment, Supreme Court appointments just got way easier. Yup, this is high level horse trading but I don't care. I want change and Liebs seat help this cause regardless how reprehensible he happens to be.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 09:22 PM
Original article: Beyond rescue

Leary's persona and career is based plagiarism

Denis Leary's career is largely based on plagiarism. He ripped off Bill Hick's red meat, chain smoking bah-humbug persona but without the insight or intelligence.

Since that time he's tried to keep the shock value at a maximum to keep the persona rolling but it rings hollow, lacks irony.

"Matt Dillon Is a Giant Fag" is a perfect example. It's there to get attention, not to make a point or find a deeper truth. Many people see this as aloof but if you look deep inside there's nothing.

Leary has the same phoniness in his persona that Tom Cruise has with women. Perhaps he now has something of value to say but it's wrapped in fraud and thus it can't ring true. His false outrage is fake, shallow and dumb. He's a fake.

Friday, November 21, 2008 12:43 PM

good and now the drama can end...we can hope

Hillary Clinton has the resume, name rec and clout to do this job. I hope she does well.

Still, if the drama (perhaps not to her doing) surrounding this process and her campaign are examples of how things work around her, the election of Obama was the right thing.

Friday, November 21, 2008 04:22 PM

as much as education -- it was also about security concerns

Sadly, no other first family and POTUS is going to have the same security concerns as the Obamas. I'd pick a school that has some experience with this over another if it were my kids.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 07:00 PM
Original article: Is Obama president yet?

Of course this is a rhetorical question yet apt

Everyone knows the headline is rhetorical but the point is apt.

George W. Bush, after plundering the country on so many fronts has gone into hiding yet again while the economy fails beneath us.

It's a cliche but when the going gets tough, the tough get going.

I applaud Barack Obama for stepping up early. He obviously has the courage to face trouble and he obviously wants to solve problems.

It's reassuring to know the right man was elected. Finally a President with some guts and intelligence.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:25 PM
Original article: Detroit isn't dead yet

Any doubts on Universal Healthcare and GM -- look to Canada

GM has benefited greatly from Canada's universal healthcare system for decades and decades. In Canada, GM even touts this as a good thing as it saves billions and billions of dollars each year.

The question is -- why hasn't GM in the U.S. lobbied for a similar system, in self interest? It's heartening to read that John Dingell and his father pushed for it...but where were the Big 3 on this?

It's this inability to see beyond the old capitalist/corporate construct (and vote down universal coverage) that has landed not only the Big 3 in trouble, but all of corporate America.

By not backing universal coverage, American based corporations are at a huge disadvantage. Passage of universal coverage would result in a near immediate double digit benefit.

It's truly amazing corporate America votes against universal coverage year in and year out. Only idiots vote against self-interest.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
180

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience
129

A new report questions "suicides" at Guantanamo

Why is the Obama DOJ attempting to block judicial review of three highly suspicious deaths?
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon