From the A Tiny Revolution post:

President Bush praised Yugoslavia for handing over Milosevic, saying the move showed the Balkan nation wants to turn away from ''its tragic past and toward a brighter future.''

Absurdly, the current argument is that the Bush administration should not not be prosecuted because the United States needs to look "away from its tragic past and toward a brighter future" so as not to become victim of unproductive partisan bickering.

At what point in recent history has the government been fully capable of weighing the danger appropriately? You are suggesting we should trust them becasue they know what they are doing?

I would encourage anyone to visit Senator Webb's website and offer a few words of support.

>If the answer is yes, then national security is appropriately >invoked to prevent their release. If the answer is no, if -- >as GG seems to claim -- the value of "truth" glosses over any >and all national security concerns (reasonable or excessive), >then of course those photos should be released.

Perhaps you missed this pience of info:

Still, two federal courts -- one district court and a unanimous 3-judge Court of Appeals panel -- have ruled that FOIA compels disclosure of these photographs because none of the FOIA exceptions apply.

I had trouble a little earlier. Now it is working fine.

Shucks, if Grover Norquist is on board, count me in.

http://demint.senate.gov/public/_files/2009-06-23_ATRsupportsHCFA.pdf

the earlier draft in which the A-word was written in glitter pen

"I am unqualified to drive this car, but please bear with me while I opine that red means go. Are you buckled in Mr. Buchanan?"

I'm sure there are a legal minds that will fight and say I don't know what I'm talking about

Agreed. I almost missed the joke until I reread the sentence looking for the error.

Great job, Glenn. Best use of [sic] I've seen in a long time.

NP - Great job explaining how the French situation applies to the US

But how many of those clunkers would have been sold into the market right now without this program? It's the large credit that is causing people to part with their old vehicles.

This is also being sold to the public as beneficial since it gets those environmentally unfriendly clunkers off the road, and, by design, NOT into the possession of someone looking to purchase a cheap used vehicle.

All those "clunkers"? They were traditionally immediately auctioned into the bottom rungs of the used car market.

There was a good discussion this morning with someone involved with this case. I didn't catch who she was. Appealing to the SC is still an option, but they have not yet decided to proceed at this point.