Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

bystander

Published Letters: 3781

Monday, October 8, 2007 12:19 PM

"concern troll" alert

Technically, I think I'd need to set up a sock puppet and 'converse' with myself to qualify for that distinction... however, this may sound close to some ears.

I've been trying to recall exactly when I stopped reading most of the pundits in the M$M, when I began to get suspicious of the 'news' reporting I was subjecting myself to, how I began to discover blogs, never mind how I came to find Glenn's UT. And, in truth, I can't remember. Except I do recall *when* it happened. My circumstances had shifted sufficiently so I was spending more and more time at a computer, and needed to search some things online. Boredom/frustration with the immediate tasks at hand, and a loosening of some time constraints afforded an opportunity.

I wonder how unique those circumstances might be in relation to the general population. Searching out a 'reliable' blog takes time. Once I found one reliable online community, that community led me to others. My list of bookmarks has undergone several iterations. I suspect for those frequenting here, the trajectory may not be very different. I'm less convinced that the average folks I cross paths with in the grocery store, health club, library, gas station have equivalent opportunities. And, consequently, I do wonder about how deeply blog generated information can penetrate into the general population. That's why I was curious about what our mysterious anonymous poster who wouldn't offer a precis had to say. I thought s/he might have a similar concern.

Online communities may be the answer to lots of different social issues, and the spread of some social/political agendas. But, I wonder, given the constraints that encumber most folks' lives, and mine again, eventually, how viable this medium is for countering the reach of newsprint, television, and radio. Which is why I wish I could recall what it was that set off my crap detectors in the first place. Occasionally, I'll link to someone's blog in an email I send, but knowing what I know about them, I'm fairly certain they don't look. What I try to do instead is sow seeds of doubt. I guess I'm hoping that folks I care about will begin a search on their own. Otherwise, it's just too darned convenient to read that newspaper that's delivered to your door, turn on the tube at night, or flip on the radio where you whip through channels until you get the music you want to hear.

Monday, October 8, 2007 12:48 PM

One more cite

David Levy's Time to weigh in on the Israel lobby debate was also posted over at TPMCafe. I scrolled through the comments. Only, the very brave go there. Our Win appears not to have participated in that one.

http://tinyurl.com/22q35r

Monday, October 8, 2007 06:52 PM

@ kovie, @ pantanal

Thanks. Thanks, very much.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007 07:13 AM

Gah!

Well said, Tim.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007 03:10 PM

Gad!

Sitting on the sidelines of today's conversations is kind of like watching Psycho when I was about 9, or Wait Until Dark at 16. I want to keep my hands over my eyes and hum to myself, and yet feel compelled to watch. Thanks, all. You're scaring the s#!^ out of me, but I suspect it's for my own good.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007 05:52 PM

@ patg

I imagine there are a number of folks who would prefer to vote for an "honest on the principles" Republican over a "dishonest on the principles" Democrat. I can live with the form of fiscal conservatism, social liberalism of some of my Republican and Libertarian friends. I can't live with the Authoritarians, who if they can't bully you, then try to savage you, like Michelle Malkin has done. As an independent/unaffiliated voter I've reserved judgment on who the parties pick to run, but this year I've pumped as much money as I can afford into preferred Democratic candidates. In a few years I'll be actively supporting a serious challenger to my current Bush-Dog senator.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:09 PM
Original article: A nation of Rich Lowrys

????

Perhaps we could agree on limp dick as an appropriate replacement for pussy. The former is accurately gender specific, and identifies the masculine fear which resides beneath the latter.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007 02:49 PM
Original article: A nation of Rich Lowrys

Thanks, SusanMc

For the link to The Startle Reflex. Yep. That's how it goes. Panic attacks. I've only experienced one in my life. The clients I worked with at one point experienced them all the time. Having survived exactly one, I can see why cascading attacks would make one suicidal. I wish her well.

Most Active Letters Threads

529

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
431

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
190

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
131

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
104

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon