Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Tobbar

Published Letters: 225
Editor's Choice: 9

Monday, November 23, 2009 01:06 PM

Indeed DWG,

Blame the game, not the player. That the game is a poiticized nightmare world of disinformation and propeganda from the denier crowd should come as a surprise to no one.

Monday, November 23, 2009 12:06 PM

I second PretzelAttack-

- Let Mcyntire post his entire email cache for the same period as the CRU hack and let the chips fall where they may.

fprawl- where do you work in the university? The mailroom? Zing!

Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:13 PM
Original article: Climate-gate!

DWG, Renegade-

- it really bugs 'em when you bring up their past failures and humiliations, doesn't it? Dayum!

And I love how the deniers decry the lack of polite discourse and then, on the same fucking page go all crazy apeshit on your for daring to disagree with them.

It's like they're classic school-yard bullies who can dish it out, but can't take it.

But over the course of this letters section, you've made them take it again, and again, and again.

Bravo!

Saturday, November 21, 2009 03:52 PM
Original article: Climate-gate!

Please Odelnette, don't hurt 'em!

Oh... too late!

Squaresville is taping himself up, but he's out for the season.

Saturday, November 21, 2009 12:50 PM
Original article: Climate-gate!

DWG, Ondlette, Paulpsd7, Bigguns

I love how you are slaughtering your opponents on this thread. It is like a work of art watching it happen. Like Rohirim charging into the Urik Hai. A thing of terrible beauty!

I want to thank you for taking the time to do this, and to thank the deniers for showing that no amount of information, science, real-world observation, or internet humiliation will change your fool minds. Deniers, your example of incredible unreasonableness and ignorance is really the most damning part. Keep it up so the world can see how fools conduct themselves.

Keep the confidence, ladies and gentlemen!

Sunday, October 18, 2009 01:59 PM

DWG, Publicola,

I just want to thank you for the thankless task of troll-slaying that you've done on this thread. Outstanding work.

I would also like to thank fellowvoyager for settin' up the misinformation and misdirection so you two can knock 'em down.

Anthropogenic climate change is one of the big issues facing humanity, and the more deniers that get schooled in public forums the sooner we can start to do the hard work of dealing with it.

Keep the confidence!

Thursday, October 15, 2009 07:58 PM

Dawkins back in Salon-

- that's a good sign.

But I still want to know, when does PZ Meyers get his say? Salon's had articles and reviews dogging him and he should get his chance to fire back.

Saturday, September 12, 2009 09:15 AM

The danger of poking at beloved fictions-

Wow. The response from the right is unusually strong, stupid, and shrill on this.

And I think that goes to prove that they love their fictions more than reality. In the 2008 presidential election it became clear that the right loved its political fictions mroe than the health of country. More than their own health. However, many of them did end up switching sides, joining the larger group of clear-eyed rock-ribbed realists that were stepping up to the plate.

I think that has generated a lot of self-hatred on the right, and these kinds of books are exactly what they need to soothe their guilt. And to show to their too-dumb-for-hope red friends and family that they are still with the movement.

Thus the furious backlash against this article. Your precious fantasies are just that- fantasies.

I also think it shows why they seem to love actors so mcuh- they really don't like reality, they prefer their fantasies.

Again, it's a good thing that there are more leftists and realists than self-hating, thumb-sucking right-wingers.

Sunday, September 6, 2009 08:15 AM
Original article: Tears for fears

New heights-

-of awesome from HH. Best ILTW EVAH!

Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:36 AM

So many gun-toting pansies

- so little time...

Saturday, August 1, 2009 04:52 PM

Ah, the communication thing-

-that part is right. 'Cause every poly person I've ever met won't shut up about it once they get going.

I swear they love the drama more than the people. Poly-drama-ry would fit them better.

I've only met a very small sample, but each and every one of them left me with that impression.

Monday, June 29, 2009 04:16 PM

The place and the time?

Your mom's house tomorrow. Right after mah booty call!

Monday, June 29, 2009 04:15 PM

Fisticuffs! Redneck for "You beat me!"

Op Max.... I thought you couldn't get any worse. Any lower. How wrong I was.

The ad hominem-- we're soaking in it. Due to you! Nice distraction maneuver, by the way, but I won't be taken on a tangent to re-beat you and the rest of the Red by re: Gore and Carson.

Nor will I believe that fellow readers of these letters are too damn lazy to go back two pages and read what I actuallly wrote, so I have no fear that your droopy little attempts to spin my words will find fertile ground.

You deniers and yer sunspots. The link between solar sunspot activity is a well understood mechanism in the short term. In fact, it is so well understood that most people realize that solar activity has been pretty steady since the 60s, and that the eleven year sunspot cycle has the effect you'd expect-- if anthropogenic climate change is true.

Nice way to fall on your sword there.

I have, perhaps, failed to make the CO2 lag situation simple enough for you. That said, your lack of understanding of the role that CO2 plays in climate does not mean that, in fact, CO2 has no role in the climate. Your ignorance, while understandable, is still ignorance.

On the one hand you claim that oceans will absorb the CO2 for us (which, by the way, implies that CO2 has a role in climate change), but then you turn around and claim that warm oceans will not absorb CO2. Have it both ways much? Plus, you know, the phytoplankton and all that that you just skipped.

Again with the numbers of deniers vs. numbers of people writing the report. It was stupid the first time you said it, and hasn't gotten any smarter since.

The fact you can't grasp the nomenclature of different branches of science does not mean that different branches of science do not have particular nomenclature. "Theory" has a lot more weight than you feel comfortable admitting. Oh wait, you do admit it by citing to laws from... wait for it... physics!

Most Active Letters Threads

561

Everybody hates mommy

We're "stroller Nazis." We're whiny "breeders." Why is there so much contempt for mothers these days?
330

The extreme secrecy of the federal courts

Judges are not only permitted, but required, to conceal anything the government declares to be secret.
304

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
215

Praying for Obama's death

Pastors are invoking Psalm 109 -- "May his days be few" -- in hopes of saving our country, and our souls
163

Explaining ClimateGate: A history of distrust

Asking researchers to delete e-mails after receiving an FOI request is never a good idea. So why did it happen?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon