Letters to the Editor
Chris Sinnard
Published Letters: 1260 Editor's Choice: 7
-
Yeah, AFTER is right...
[Read the article: A supersize controversy]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Let me be clear: I'm not defending the superdelegate system. Democrats can, and probably should, put it up for redefinition after this election.
Yeah, redefine them after Hillary uses them to swipe the nomination in a smoke filled room, lolololol. Start making up the excuses now, the Left should be pretty good at making up excuses at this point, especially with all the practice they've had making excuses for being part of the war party while pretending to be "the antiwar party" since 06'.
Oh wait, I forgot, that situation is impossible because Democrats are perfect and awesome and only Evil Old Rs would do something corrupt, lololol. Don't worry, the same spineless and crooked leadership that has caved to Fearless Leader time and again since 06' will make sure that nothing "changes".
What a crock. The Superdelagates are doing exactly what they were created to do, pull the rug out from under the "activists", aka the frothing at the mouth True Believers at KOS, and make sure the Establishment wins in the end. If the people vote to support the establishment candidate, everything is fine and dandy, if not, fuck em'.
Talk about a win-win for the entrenched warmongering puppets that run the show.
-
Translation:
[Read the article: A supersize controversy]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Dear Passionate True Believers,
We decide who gets the nod, not the blogosphere.
Fuck you,
-The "antiwar" Establishment
-
@Juliebird, so what?
[Read the article: A supersize controversy]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Superdelegates were created in 1984.
So what?
Really, this is something that can not be HRC's, or Bill's, fault.
Who is talking about "fault"? It isn't about fault or some conspriacy, it is about exploiting whatever you can to win.
The point is, just because they were created in 1984 doesn't mean that Billary won't exploit anything it can to win now, in 2008, especially since Hillary is doing SO WELL in the primary process. SO WELL for Hilldog, i.e. if it weren't for careful gerrymandering she would be getting completely creamed, instead of claiming that "next time" will be when she pulls ahead because of [insert special insterest, e.g. latinos, unions] in TX or some big upcoming state.
She is doing so well that she is even trying to exploit MI. Whatever it takes to win.
-
So, will these be the meme, i.e. "big lie", streaming forth from the apologists?
[Read the article: A supersize controversy]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Voting the way your district voted is redundant; Superdelegates are needed to override Republican crossover voting
So this will be the "big lie" that the apologists will use to brainwash the true believers, eh? Frankenrove is even thrown in, nice touch. Thanks for the 411, but if you want to top off the story you should really include that Rove is working with Zionist Jews and top secret Jesuits sent by the Vatican.
Anyone who thinks this candidate is the "agent of change", rather than the agent of Karl Rove and the Bush-Cheney camp is simply not considering the facts.
The Rove Monster is still hiding under your bed, plotting to take out Warrior Princess Hillary Clinton? I haven't seen this one on www.Rense.com yet.
-
"That's the rules."
[Read the article: Clinton's "win-at-all-costs strategy"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]And crossover voting in open primaries isn't against them either.
-
Secrecy
[Read the article: The courts and Congress affirmatively conceal and protect lawbreaking]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]What should we expect from people who are members of secrecy obsessed frat cults their whole lives, like Skull & Bones, Bilderberg, and Bohemian Grove? A belief that transparency is more powerful than secrecy and secret knowledge? Because those seem like absolutely perfect environments to foster that kind of desired behavior, frat cults and blackmail, lol. Our political and intellectual elites thrive on Knowledge is Power and the "secret knowledge" of things like freemasonry. Except instead of keeping powerful secrets like how to make pretty buildings with a compass and straightedge, they use their secrecy for more modern applications.
Imagine if, say, Vladimir Putin was accused by his own top officials of systematically spying on Russian citizens for years in ways that were patently illegal, but he then manipulated the courts to ensure he was never accountable, and had his political allies in parliament block any investigations, so that the activities remained concealed forever and he was never made to answer for what he did.
That would require our elite to care about the "Golden Rule", and we can't have that. That is like asking an American how they would feel if the Chinese invaded Mexico and set up the largest permanent military base in the world. Or asking an American how they would feel if the Secret Intelligence Services of a Foreign Government on the other side of the globe covertly overthrew our Government and installed a medieval dictator and a brutal police state apparatus.
The ethic of reciprocity is not to be given to "bad guys", as the goal of such propaganda is to dehumanize the "bad guys". If they are not perceived as human then they can be treated differently, i.e. in a way that would be considered immoral if done to "humans" or "good guys". A one-two punch. Treat the bad guys like shit, and then when they retaliate, claim that their retaliation is because of their "inhumanness", and make your dehumanizing case against the "bad guys" even stronger. Seems like business as usual to me.
That way moral relativism can rule the day without making the so-called "absolutist good guy" appear overtly hypocritical, even though both sides love relativism and will most definitely use it to further their own agenda. The tyranny of whoever is in charge. The only "golden" concepts that our Guidestone following Pagan elite care about are bullion and ratio.
-
Don't worry, Mr. Dirks
[Read the article: The courts and Congress affirmatively conceal and protect lawbreaking]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]That the administration has been routinely and in direct defiance of the law
Don't worry, there will be plenty more law breaking by the Government in the future. Time stops for no criminal.
-
whoa whoa whoa! Hold on a second!!!
[Read the article: A.J. Rossmiller: "Still Broken"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]LWM is defending the empire and the central banking system that enables it???
LWM is defending the status quo simply because it is the status quo? No matter how ridiculous and unsustainable the course may be? Say it isn't so.