Letters to the Editor
Chris Sinnard
Published Letters: 1157 Editor's Choice: 7
-
Why support Paul?
[Read the article: Various items]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]...none of that explains why you would want to elect another Republican president (even a libertarian one), before the party is purged of the cabal that hijacked it. That doesn't make sense to me.
Because the Democrats have done a great job purging the cabal, amirite? Isn't impeachment already off the table? Pelosi sold out to AIPAC a long time ago, and Israel's "Iran war" (i.e. massive air strikes against ~1200 targets) is ready to go (favors for favors). Paul has outflanked even the Dems with his position of "absolutely get the troops out completely, and as an added security bonus, get them off of the Arabian peninsula entirely".
Don't believe that we will attack Iran, let alone use nukes? Perhaps you read about the news story regarding the nukes in the B-52:
http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/NEWS01/70904040
Nuclear warheads mistakenly flown on B-52, landing at Barksdale AFB
A B-52 bomber mistakenly loaded with five nuclear warheads flew from Minot Air Force Base, N.D, to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30, resulting in an Air Force-wide investigation, according to three officers who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the incident.
The B-52 was loaded with Advanced Cruise Missiles, part of a Defense Department effort to decommission 400 of the ACMs. But the nuclear warheads should have been removed at Minot before being transported to Barksdale, the officers said. The missiles were mounted onto the pylons of the bomber’s wings.
This seemed "fishy" to someone, so they called a buddy:
So I called a old friend and retired B-52 pilot and asked him. What he told me offers one compelling case of circumstantial evidence. My buddy, let’s call him Jack D. Ripper, reminded me that the only times you put weapons on a plane is when they are on alert or if you are tasked to move the weapons to a specific site.
Then he told me something I had not heard before.
Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?
His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.
A leak showing everyone that nukes are going to an important base seems much more probable than an "accident" in which nukes "somehow" got on the plane. The "investigation" will not be "how did the nukes get there?", but "who leaked the info to the press?". Witch hunt would be a better word than investigation. I imagine they already have their pitchforks and torches and are ready to lynch the whistle-blower who leaked this information, NOT figure out how the nukes got on the plane. The MSM already went into damage control with an "accident" story. They already know how the nukes got there, they were put there on purpose, on a plane that flew into a base that is a Middle East launching point. There are a million checklists and procedures to stop "accidents" like nukes going unaccounted for and ending up on a bomber.
Could it be that Israel is finally getting its "war" with Iran? And a nuclear one to boot? Don't expect the Dems to get in the way, they want to watch Bush hang, right? And more importantly, the Freshman Dems just got back from an AIPAC sponsored indoctrination session in Israel, so expect more of the same from our Israel-First political establishment.
Reasons to like Ron Paul: AIPAC, The Saudis, The CFR, The AIE, The Fed, The IRS, Fox News, Hot Air, Hannity, Limbaugh, Savage, Ingraham, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Daily Kos, the international bankers, our corporate masters, all don't. They hate him and most will viciously rant about him. They are all scared to death of Paul because his taboo breaking does not stay within the lines and cracks the walls of the Matrix, potentially exposing to the public big lie that is our contrived reality (how come he says what I am thinking?). Although dismantling the Matrix is a scary thought for some people, what other reasons do you need?
-
Wallace is a cheerleader
[Read the article: Various items]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Really? I don't believe I've ever heard that term. Please enlighten me some more.
I detect sarcasm.
You don't actually mean to tell me that Fox News debate panelists actually had agendas they were trying to interject and project into the debate? That would be unconscionable.
Crazy, but it's true. Every suit on that stage wanted to take poor old Ron into the airport bathroom and have their way with him Larry Craig style.
I thought you said Wallace was a real pro. I guess that was just sarcasm. Sorry I missed your context.
Yes, it was, Wallace is a condescending little turd. He and his buddies won't be giggling so much next year. His dad must be proud.
-
lol, the Dems strat for Iraq is...... nothing
[Read the article: Killing her softly with his song]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Is a small-government extremist. No chance of election. None whatsoever.
Lol, whatever you have to tell yourself. I imagine he is an extremist on the left regarding the war as well? I say that because Paul's strategy of pulling out completely, from the entire region, including Saudi Arabia which he is not ashamed of, is something that even the almighty Democratic doves have to pussyfoot around with. I mean, God forbid they go against the war and "not let Bush hang himself", i.e. Go against the agenda of The Lobby.