Ah, global warming. Funny how it involves the Sun, the most politicized and worshiped object in the history of mankind. Nothing whips up fear among the masses like saying that bad stuff is related to the Sun. Haven't any of you seen Apocalypto? It's the same story.

Environmental degradation is a high level threat to humanity, but I am more concerned about the crap in my drinking water and how to recycle the maelstrom of plastic bags in the ocean than I am about elites trying to fear me up with their age old song and dance about the Sun.

Follow the money. Who benefits? Oh hey, look! A Rothschild! WTF else is new? Sometimes you gotta love Alex Jones:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/090707closertosun.htm

David Mayer de Rothschild is the youngest child (born 1978) of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, of the British wing of the Rothschild banking family.

Rothschild's recent book, 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Changes, calls for ordinary people to limit outward behavior and even work at home and was used as part of the PR blitz to accompany the Live Earth project.

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show this past Friday, Rothschild reacted to a point about massive climate change at every point of the solar system and its relation to natural sun cycles by claiming Mars, Saturn and Jupiter were closer to the sun than Earth!

The point isn't about the merits of socialism, it is that Paul's positions are NOT socialist, AT ALL. Central Banking IS socialist, you know, it has the whole "Central" thing going for it. Methinks that Mises has had a very large impact on Paul, and Mises was definitely not a socialist. In fact, he wrote a little book called Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis.

http://www.amazon.com/Socialism-Sociological-Ludwig-von-Mises/dp/0913966630

So, to claim that Paul "sounds like a socialist" when he is speaking out against CENTRAL banking doesn't make any sense. Paul sounds more like a populist, being in MI and all. It isn't a left/right issue, it is an up/down issue.

Ron Paul was on The Abrams Report yesterday, Bush came up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2EH_TRa6aU

At about 3:30 in, or 46 seconds left, Abrams asked Paul about an endorsement from Fearless Leader:

Abrams: Do you want President Bush's endorsement?

Paul: ...that has not crossed my mind, because I know that it wouldn't come. I mean, he didn't even endorse me for...

Abrams: Well would you want it? If he [Bush] said, "I want to know, do you want my endorsement?"

Paul: I would lose credibility.

Abrams: So you would say no?

Paul: I think that would hurt me. He wouldn't offer it and I wouldn't ask him.

Abrams: You would say no to president Bush's endorsement?

Paul: No, I would lose all credibility because I've run against his policies.

Ron Paul gets it. The gig is up, Dr. No is crashing the party. He will also crush Hillary in the General election, or any of the other top Democrats, on the war issue alone. Paul is not a centrist and will outflank them all on the war, especially the War Goddess and Edwards, who goes on TV and tells everyone his strategy is focused on using Iraq to beat a pro-war Republican. Paul is their biggest threat and they know it. They are all screwed.

Tell your husband you're a selfish whore and see how he reacts. Cheaters aren't all that bad, but cheaters who keep secrets are trash.

Once a cheater always a cheater. Her husband is naive for marrying her. I am going to assume he trusts this woman, a woman who was previously married when they started dating. Wow, he must be into denying reality. If a woman being married doesn't set off alarm bells and isn't the most massive of red flags when it comes to a relationship, let alone marriage, then he deserves everything that he has coming to him. The beasts you ignore are the ones that come home to roost.

She sounds like a manipulative whore and he sounds like an ignorant fool who just wanted to get hitched to the closest post, red flags be damned. I've seen ton of relationships like theirs, and none of them last.