Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Nikita

Published Letters: 77
Editor's Choice: 7

Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:32 AM
Original article: Bring your infant to work?

Response to various

"Having a family, family sickness, childbirth, end of life care, etc, those are all serious life issues that require attention, they are not choices."

Um, no. Two of four are things you choose to engage in -- others are social contracts that you're entangled in through no choice of your own. "Having a family," for example, is a discriminatory way of terming "getting pregnant with a committed partner," and it's entirely voluntary -- as proven by a number of people in the world who CHOOSE not to do it, approximately 20% of the population.

"Its on par with a single person getting sick and being forced into early retirement because "its unfair to let them do less work for the same pay.""

False, and it happens every day to people who are in or not in a variety of relationships.

As for the 20-some hip person...it really doesn't matter who's sitting in that movie theater. The fact of the matter is that the rest of us deserve to get what we paid for -- not squalling or cooing or rude comments or distractions in our workplaces. And if infants constitute any of these, no one other than the folks who chose to conceive and give birth to them should be compelled to deal with them.

Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:36 AM
Original article: Bring your infant to work?

P.S. Insurance

My employer offers a cafeteria insurance plan.

Plan A covers everything deemed necessary or routine at the same rate. So childbirth is subsidized, but you're a whole lot less likely to opt for something which is more expensive if the choice is yours since you'll be paying for 20% of it.

Plan B covers most of the usual childbirth stuff -- I understand that a c-section on that plan will cost you about $3,000.

Plan C covers all maternity visits, childbirth, and the first well child visit for about $50.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006 05:16 AM

Letters Kill the Forum

My opinion is that th letters section functions like a forum, rather than an actual letter section. therefore it kills the actual discussion forum.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:51 AM

I Don't Buy It

I had two granddads and a dad, all of whom were loving, supportive folks. So I don't buy the base assumption of old dad = bread-earning, emotionally distant guy.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006 08:39 PM
Original article: Blow-job blowhards

Personally...

I like sucking cock. I like going down on girls, too. I never really think of it as humiliating other than when someone's trying to make me do it when I'm not interested or said person wants some, but doesn't want to reciprocate.

And the meaning of the act, I feel, is all about context. For example, for five years I had a boyfriend who wouldn't allow me to go down on him. Some people might take his refusal as a sign of respect, but it was symptomatic of other issues in the relationship -- namely that he was untrusting and unwilling to relax enough to enjoy being given the gift of pleasure. So it was a sign of being unwilling to really let me get close to him as well as a sign of a lack of acceptance. What's empowering about that?

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 01:16 PM

Take the Money

I say if Hooters is willing to support the animal organization, then let them. 'Cause, heck, they need every penny they can get. and as a bonus they get exposure to the Hooters audience, which might not be their usual one.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 01:37 PM

Not Catchy, But...

Pro-personal autonomy?

Pro-self-determination?

Pro-privacy in medical care?

Pro-hippocratic oath?

Pro-compassion in care?

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:57 PM

Currently mending my slobbish ways

...and I didn't find the article that appalling. But then, while I haven't ever been accused of being a neat freak, I have decided not to date someone based on the contents of their apartment. Which is to say the litter box they don't clean, the obsessive-compulsive folded and ironed boxer shorts, the pizza boxes stacked on the table, the mounds of cigarettes, the kitty fur tumbleweeds holding the roommate hostage, the obsessive need to get up after knockin' boots and clean the kitchen counter. All of those are deal breakers. So are Thomas Kincade paintings and Precious Moments paraphernalia and heartfelt talks about Jesus. What's wrong with that, exactly? All of these have something in common, which is that they indicate we're not compatible and we won't be working toward the same aims.

The issue with the article is its implications being targeted to women -- but there's nothing wrong with no pursuing a relationship with someone whose notions of home are very different than yours.

Most Active Letters Threads

367

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
203

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
102

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
50

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon