Letters to the Editor
krisellyn
Published Letters: 16
-
Good Job, Sean
[Read the article: Why Hillary Clinton should be winning]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Once again, the democrats are trying to shoot themselves in the foot. A two term senator who 49% (latest polling) of the electorate think his greatest weakness is experience, seems to be a reasonable nominee to put up against McCain. Two wars, a struggling economy, a healthcare crisis he knows nothing about, and Obama is going to win in November? Talk about fantasy land.
Quick note about Editor's Picks - you should call them Obamabot Picks. I'm surprised this article even got posted.
-
Bravo Joan!
[Read the article: Thank you, Rush Limbaugh!]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I find people resort to vulgar language when they have no concrete criticism to fall back on. Senator Clinton is extremely intelligent, skilled, and has done her research for so long she's a walking encyclopedia. Strong women scare people. When people are scared they throw sticks and stones, and names that hurt.
-
Thank you Ms. Walsh
[Read the article: My last word (for now) on sexism]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]That was beautiful. Thank you for posting it.
-
You people frustrate me to the point of screaming!
[Read the article: Defending campaign, Clinton cites RFK assassination]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Hillary Clinton has to make no mistakes, small, or otherwise, and the whole MSM jumps on her and says she's not "human". Give me a break! Obama constantly says the most stupid things, "visiting all 57 states", "sweetie", "typical white person", "you're likeable, enough", etc., (not to mention his policies, which are so slap dash they're a joke!) and the MSM bends over backwards to be apologists for him. This huge double standard infuriates me and I'm not alone. Woman scorned, baby. Woman scorned.
-
Wow, this writer has it all figured out!
[Read the article: The fight over Florida and Michigan]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Knowing what this writer seems to know, it makes a person wonder why there is going to be a meeting on Friday after all. Smoky backroom deals aside, he seems to think there is a conspirocy of Obama supporters that will just give him everything he wants. "We'll find a way" to give him the uncommitted delegates. Whatever happened to the outrage about the superdelegates handing over the election to the nominee? Oh, right, that was before it was being handed over to Obama.
-
Truth hurts
[Read the article: Ferraro wants study on sexism, racism in campaign]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]You take such umbrage from this Op-Ed, Alex, because you're the type of "journalist" she's referring to. Better to attack the messenger than examine your own motives for such vitriol this election cycle.
-
Oh, the love for Hillary is flowing!
[Read the article: Clinton suspends campaign, endorses Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Everyone, MSM, blogs, pundits, all love Hillary now. When Chris Matthews and Keith Oberrman wax poetic about her, you know the world is coming to an end. Well, let's see how many people have long memories come November.
-
Joan, they're setting her up for another fall.
[Read the article: Clinton endorses Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Dear Joan, Hillary can't win for losing. She does what they want, they criticize her. She does what is right, they criticize her. Now that she isn't in thier political way, the pundits are praising her like she's the next best thing to sliced bread. Some are even being kind; the same people that have been so cruel I stopped watching thier shows. The division in the democratic party was created by the pundits and the biased media outlets pretending to be objective. Terry McCaullife said, "congradulations on your win," to John King at the concession speech today. And John King just smiled. That is what created the wedge between the Obama campaign and the Clinton campaign. The marked unfairness of the coverage and the double standards. Nothing Obama does is going to make that open sore heal for a percentage of Clinton supporters. We're so angry, we're drunk with it. So every time I hear sweet words for Hillary come out of an Obamabot "news" person or "Democratic (read Obama supporter)Strategist", I feel rage at the hypocrisy. This is the "Change" we've all been waiting for? Sounds like more of the same to me. Iron my Shirts, indeed. With the race in November so close, what kind of percentage of outraged Clinton supporters would it take to put McCain over the top? Obamabots have already said if Obama loses in November it will be Clinton's fault. Obama is so fey, and is such a pawn to history, that Hillary Clinton's very existance has the ability to lose a general election for him. Ignore his shady associates, his lack of experience, his "sweetie", "bittergate", "typical white person" remarks. After all, the superdelegates have. Ignore that whole MI/FL fiasco of giving Obama 59 delegates he didn't earn and taking 4 from Clinton, because he probably won't carry those states anyway. In the end, it will be Hillary Clinton's fault. Sincerely, Woman Scorned.